Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7581663" data-attributes="member: 6919838">i would have thought it obvious but the goal of disarming someone during battle is not normally about being the one who has the weapon at the end, but depriving them of the ability to use that weapon during the battle and/or using it yourselves (your team.) thats why in a genre/setting which combined frequent disarms, mobs and the like as well as the notion of significant magical weapons, the two hit a conflict. Like i said, why not instead make a gauntlet that gives the bonuses to whatever sword you wield with the glove? Why would weapons that can be popped out and run off with by by a lucky kobold or three of its buddies etc be the norm? Why would you spend massive numbers of days and months to make a frostbrand or vorpal blade or luck blade and not add in "cannot be disarmed" as an extra day or two of effort? Some folks think of that when adding rules and choosing rules for their campaigns, other may not. takes all kinds.</blockquote>