Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Some thoughts on skills.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8918119" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>...<em>but it is the details that matter here</em>.</p><p></p><p>Like...I completely grant that in terms of grand, universal stuff, human psychology has patterns. I never said or implied otherwise.</p><p></p><p>But when it comes to the actual details of how things should be done, we literally have <strong>all of human history</strong> to show how much humans <em>don't</em> think perfectly alike. Ethics. Political philosophy. Economics. Art. Literature. Theater. There are people who think <em>Slaughterhouse-Five</em> is an amazing book, for goodness' sake. Einstein was simultaneously one of the founders of quantum mechanics (he described and properly developed the photoelectric effect, IIRC the first <em>properly</em> quantum physical theory) and one of its greatest critics ("God does not play dice" etc.)</p><p></p><p>The fact that we do share so much and yet disagree over the details makes things worse, not better. It's like the uncanny valley effect: up to a certain point, more shared thoughts and beliefs <em>are</em> good, constructive, make it easier to communicate. But it takes a nosedive at some high percentage and only climbs back up as you get extremely close to <em>perfect</em> agreement. If we genuinely didn't agree on some of the basics, we'd discover that very quickly, and it would lead to more communication (or, I suppose, terminating the relationship, but I prefer to think more positively.) But when you agree on a great deal of things and then run into trouble <em>only</em> with the fine details, it's much more cumbersome because you've now got to question everything you <em>used</em> to assume, and you're extremely likely to miss something or forget or think you've got it covered when you don't.</p><p></p><p>We all have a common human perception of existence. But if you speak about "football" in a room of native English speakers, man oh man, there are some <em>real</em> conflicts that can arise. <em>Even when everyone in question actually knows which game you're talking about.</em></p><p></p><p>Or, if you want something more pithy...</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]2ZksQd2fC6Y[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8918119, member: 6790260"] ...[I]but it is the details that matter here[/I]. Like...I completely grant that in terms of grand, universal stuff, human psychology has patterns. I never said or implied otherwise. But when it comes to the actual details of how things should be done, we literally have [B]all of human history[/B] to show how much humans [I]don't[/I] think perfectly alike. Ethics. Political philosophy. Economics. Art. Literature. Theater. There are people who think [I]Slaughterhouse-Five[/I] is an amazing book, for goodness' sake. Einstein was simultaneously one of the founders of quantum mechanics (he described and properly developed the photoelectric effect, IIRC the first [I]properly[/I] quantum physical theory) and one of its greatest critics ("God does not play dice" etc.) The fact that we do share so much and yet disagree over the details makes things worse, not better. It's like the uncanny valley effect: up to a certain point, more shared thoughts and beliefs [I]are[/I] good, constructive, make it easier to communicate. But it takes a nosedive at some high percentage and only climbs back up as you get extremely close to [I]perfect[/I] agreement. If we genuinely didn't agree on some of the basics, we'd discover that very quickly, and it would lead to more communication (or, I suppose, terminating the relationship, but I prefer to think more positively.) But when you agree on a great deal of things and then run into trouble [I]only[/I] with the fine details, it's much more cumbersome because you've now got to question everything you [I]used[/I] to assume, and you're extremely likely to miss something or forget or think you've got it covered when you don't. We all have a common human perception of existence. But if you speak about "football" in a room of native English speakers, man oh man, there are some [I]real[/I] conflicts that can arise. [I]Even when everyone in question actually knows which game you're talking about.[/I] Or, if you want something more pithy... [MEDIA=youtube]2ZksQd2fC6Y[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Some thoughts on skills.
Top