Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Souljourner" data-source="post: 3704842" data-attributes="member: 1622">I really hope they merge the wizard and sorcerer.&nbsp; I always thought it was awful they had both.... for god's sake, make up your mind and pick one!&nbsp; They're not different enough to justify two whole base classes.If they do something like Star Wars Talent Trees they could probably scale things back to something like Wizard/Fighter/Cleric/Rogue and just use talent trees to customize out into Bard/Paladin/Barbarian/Monk/Druid.&nbsp; I think the talent trees would have to be very well thought out, though, otherwise everyone will end up looking the same.[edit]Ug... why keep barbarian?&nbsp; It only has one thing that makes it unique - rage.&nbsp; Otherwise it's just a fighter.&nbsp;&nbsp; Rangers and druids and bards and paladins at least all have a wide range of special abilities.&nbsp; Not only that, but barbarian is almost more of a role-playing choice than a class choice.&nbsp; -Nate</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Souljourner, post: 3704842, member: 1622"] I really hope they merge the wizard and sorcerer. I always thought it was awful they had both.... for god's sake, make up your mind and pick one! They're not different enough to justify two whole base classes. If they do something like Star Wars Talent Trees they could probably scale things back to something like Wizard/Fighter/Cleric/Rogue and just use talent trees to customize out into Bard/Paladin/Barbarian/Monk/Druid. I think the talent trees would have to be very well thought out, though, otherwise everyone will end up looking the same. [edit] Ug... why keep barbarian? It only has one thing that makes it unique - rage. Otherwise it's just a fighter. Rangers and druids and bards and paladins at least all have a wide range of special abilities. Not only that, but barbarian is almost more of a role-playing choice than a class choice. -Nate [/QUOTE]

Verification