Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Something I would not like to see in 5e: The Tempest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andor" data-source="post: 5868222" data-attributes="member: 1879"><p>Dranko rocks!</p><p></p><p>Although oddly enough I don't have a problem with the lasher PrC despite the point of this thread....</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why is that?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, because the whip isn't really a weapon. It's a tool which can also inflict damage.</p><p></p><p>And when I think about the Lasher PrC I mostly remember "Third Hand". Which came what, 3 levels into a 10 level class? The rest of the class however is still not about somehow using a whip to lop dragons in half, it provides themantically appropriate abilites which are more about status infliction and control than raw damage. A lasher is never going to stand toe-to-toe with a raging barbarian in a DPS contest. And that's okay.</p><p></p><p>Suppose you had a "Shoveler" PrC.... If all it did was somehow try to turn something as stupid a Spetznaz throwing shovel into an awesome weapon of mass destruction, I would hate the class. If it somehow made a shovel seem more shovelish and yet also useful I suppose I would be okay with it, although it sounds like a dandy 3 level class, I don't see how you could get 5 out of it. And I would never be crazy about it. </p><p></p><p>And besides, as much as I love me some mystery men, a Shoveler is simply not high level heroism. </p><p></p><p>Man this thread is going in spirals....</p><p></p><p>Ok. Here is my position.</p><p></p><p>Single item centered prestige classes which do not represent a fictional or mythic archetype are bad. Single item centered PrCs that perform a useful mix of roles are good. Single item centered PrCs that desctribe a role or fighting style which is historically, mythically or ficitonally justifiable are somewhat acceptable, but I'd much rather see it done within the scope of the fighter class.</p><p></p><p>However for the most part I would must rather see item/weapon speciallization and skill building handled through the feat and/or powers maneuver system.</p><p></p><p>Arcane Archer is good. A non-magical archer PrC might also be acceptable, but I'd rather see it covered by the baseline figher/ranger. The Lasher is a cool PrC, but it could be done instead with a simple feat chain (Weapon focus whip, 3rd hand.) </p><p></p><p>A gladiator is not a varient or subclass of the fighter, it's a fighter. A <em>retarius</em>, <em>secutor</em> and <em>murmillo</em> are not sub-classes of gladiators, they are fighters. An archer, a lancer, a flamberge wielder, a lajatang wielder, a dragoon, a samurai, a skirmisher a <em>landsknecht</em>, a man fighting case or florentine. These are all fighting men, who make their living by trade in arms. They are fighters. Why would they need another class?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andor, post: 5868222, member: 1879"] Dranko rocks! Although oddly enough I don't have a problem with the lasher PrC despite the point of this thread.... Why is that? Well, because the whip isn't really a weapon. It's a tool which can also inflict damage. And when I think about the Lasher PrC I mostly remember "Third Hand". Which came what, 3 levels into a 10 level class? The rest of the class however is still not about somehow using a whip to lop dragons in half, it provides themantically appropriate abilites which are more about status infliction and control than raw damage. A lasher is never going to stand toe-to-toe with a raging barbarian in a DPS contest. And that's okay. Suppose you had a "Shoveler" PrC.... If all it did was somehow try to turn something as stupid a Spetznaz throwing shovel into an awesome weapon of mass destruction, I would hate the class. If it somehow made a shovel seem more shovelish and yet also useful I suppose I would be okay with it, although it sounds like a dandy 3 level class, I don't see how you could get 5 out of it. And I would never be crazy about it. And besides, as much as I love me some mystery men, a Shoveler is simply not high level heroism. Man this thread is going in spirals.... Ok. Here is my position. Single item centered prestige classes which do not represent a fictional or mythic archetype are bad. Single item centered PrCs that perform a useful mix of roles are good. Single item centered PrCs that desctribe a role or fighting style which is historically, mythically or ficitonally justifiable are somewhat acceptable, but I'd much rather see it done within the scope of the fighter class. However for the most part I would must rather see item/weapon speciallization and skill building handled through the feat and/or powers maneuver system. Arcane Archer is good. A non-magical archer PrC might also be acceptable, but I'd rather see it covered by the baseline figher/ranger. The Lasher is a cool PrC, but it could be done instead with a simple feat chain (Weapon focus whip, 3rd hand.) A gladiator is not a varient or subclass of the fighter, it's a fighter. A [I]retarius[/I], [I]secutor[/I] and [I]murmillo[/I] are not sub-classes of gladiators, they are fighters. An archer, a lancer, a flamberge wielder, a lajatang wielder, a dragoon, a samurai, a skirmisher a [I]landsknecht[/I], a man fighting case or florentine. These are all fighting men, who make their living by trade in arms. They are fighters. Why would they need another class? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Something I would not like to see in 5e: The Tempest
Top