Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Something I'm not quite understanding about the will save...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 425903" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>Hong: It's not necessarily a bad thing, but under the existing system, it becomes really easy to beat certain class' saves and nearly impossible to beat others. Spells effectively become a rock-paper-scissors thing; if you pick the right save, you win, if not you lose. Too absolute for my tastes.</p><p>For most casters this might not be so bad, but one of the important parts of 3E is the increase in casters with limited spell knowledge (Sorcerer, Bard, Psion, Psychic Warrior, lots of prestige classes). A Sorcerer doesn't always have a choice, he might HAVE to use the Fireball against you. With 3 save types and 5 elements, there are too many times when he doesn't have a spell that can hurt you. It doesn't really get better as time goes on, since he'll still need to be attacking with high-level spells for the save DC (or Heighten everything, which makes you run out of high-level slots really fast).</p><p></p><p>Personally I like a system where the near-immune people are less immune and those people with lousy saves are a bit better. Leveling the playing field a bit, so to speak. The 2-stat save system lets me do that without a huge amount of bookkeeping. It's not a HUGE effect, it's not going to radically change the classes, but it helps. Sorcerers and Wizards improve slightly, Rogues/Clerics/Druids decrease slightly, and most of the tank-types are basically unaffected.</p><p></p><p>Just take your characters and see what their saves would be under this system. Ask your players if they would have done their stats differently if this had been the rule at the start. Frankly, I'd be surprised if anything changed by enough to really skew your game balance.</p><p></p><p>(I also just hate how CHA always ends up as a dump stat.)</p><p></p><p>MMU1: Sure, you could do that, although I think you have to draw the line somewhere for the sake of simplicity. If you can think of good explanations to use both DEX and INT for Initiative, feel free, but I just wanted to change the save system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 425903, member: 3051"] Hong: It's not necessarily a bad thing, but under the existing system, it becomes really easy to beat certain class' saves and nearly impossible to beat others. Spells effectively become a rock-paper-scissors thing; if you pick the right save, you win, if not you lose. Too absolute for my tastes. For most casters this might not be so bad, but one of the important parts of 3E is the increase in casters with limited spell knowledge (Sorcerer, Bard, Psion, Psychic Warrior, lots of prestige classes). A Sorcerer doesn't always have a choice, he might HAVE to use the Fireball against you. With 3 save types and 5 elements, there are too many times when he doesn't have a spell that can hurt you. It doesn't really get better as time goes on, since he'll still need to be attacking with high-level spells for the save DC (or Heighten everything, which makes you run out of high-level slots really fast). Personally I like a system where the near-immune people are less immune and those people with lousy saves are a bit better. Leveling the playing field a bit, so to speak. The 2-stat save system lets me do that without a huge amount of bookkeeping. It's not a HUGE effect, it's not going to radically change the classes, but it helps. Sorcerers and Wizards improve slightly, Rogues/Clerics/Druids decrease slightly, and most of the tank-types are basically unaffected. Just take your characters and see what their saves would be under this system. Ask your players if they would have done their stats differently if this had been the rule at the start. Frankly, I'd be surprised if anything changed by enough to really skew your game balance. (I also just hate how CHA always ends up as a dump stat.) MMU1: Sure, you could do that, although I think you have to draw the line somewhere for the sake of simplicity. If you can think of good explanations to use both DEX and INT for Initiative, feel free, but I just wanted to change the save system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Something I'm not quite understanding about the will save...
Top