Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jack99" data-source="post: 4566579" data-attributes="member: 53135">Yeah, I knew it was a solo, I just wrote the wrong thing. But there is a long way already from 17 solo to 35 solo. I mean, you could probably fight it already around level 15 or 16 (the aspect) while the real Tiamat couldn't be fought anytime before 30. I see no reason why they couldn't have made it say 22 or 24 solo. Which would put it to be encountered at the same time as other aspects.I know. Or at least a level 22, if we stick to the designers' advice, and not modify by more than 5 levels. Of course not. I just expected some more continuity in the first batch of created aspects, and then leave it up to DM's if they wanted to change. I didn't expect me to have to change it's levels to make sense (at least in my world). You know I am a big fan, Ari, but do you not think that it's a bit early to encounter and be able to handle aspects of Tiamat in the mid-paragon levels?</blockquote>