Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="grodog" data-source="post: 932167" data-attributes="member: 1613">Heh.&nbsp; Jeremy, even after reading your post, and the various follow-up posts, I somehow missed the fact that the thread had been retitled until this morning.&nbsp; Not one of my more observant few days <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Eridanis, thanks for editing out the emails of Alex and the others; I'll post my &quot;sent&quot; updates in a similar manner from now on:&nbsp; stopping spam's always a good idea!Fimmtiu, shoot me your preferred email and I'll send you the files with my next batch tonight or tomorrow.&nbsp; Remember:&nbsp; the largest files are about 850K in size, so please direct me to non-hotmail, etc. accounts which can handle that kind of filesizeLastly, another deep and difficult question for Sep <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; A little while ago, you mentioned that you didn't want to elaborate upon/reveal too much about the whole idea of the Q1 planes being demiplanes in Wyre vs. alternate Prime Material Planes in Q1.&nbsp; So, my question is, do some of the sects within or outside of Oronthonian orthodoxy address this query?&nbsp; From what you've revealed, it would seem quite plausible for some sects (perhaps very conservative Heterodox sects, if such exist) to espouse an Zelanzy/Amber-like Wyre-centric view of creation, and for other such sects to counter these claims (perhaps the Transaxiomatic philosophy, the Irrenite Heresy, and/or the Urgic Mysitics?).&nbsp; Basically, I'm asking if Oronthonism addresses the uniqueness of life/creation, and how the ramifications of that truth (Truth?) are applied within game/rules setting in which other gods, planes, demons, and non-divine philosophies/forces can power divine spells, planar energies, etc.&nbsp; (Does that make sense?).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="grodog, post: 932167, member: 1613"] Heh. Jeremy, even after reading your post, and the various follow-up posts, I somehow missed the fact that the thread had been retitled until this morning. Not one of my more observant few days ;) Eridanis, thanks for editing out the emails of Alex and the others; I'll post my "sent" updates in a similar manner from now on: stopping spam's always a good idea! Fimmtiu, shoot me your preferred email and I'll send you the files with my next batch tonight or tomorrow. Remember: the largest files are about 850K in size, so please direct me to non-hotmail, etc. accounts which can handle that kind of filesize Lastly, another deep and difficult question for Sep :) A little while ago, you mentioned that you didn't want to elaborate upon/reveal too much about the whole idea of the Q1 planes being demiplanes in Wyre vs. alternate Prime Material Planes in Q1. So, my question is, do some of the sects within or outside of Oronthonian orthodoxy address this query? From what you've revealed, it would seem quite plausible for some sects (perhaps very conservative Heterodox sects, if such exist) to espouse an Zelanzy/Amber-like Wyre-centric view of creation, and for other such sects to counter these claims (perhaps the Transaxiomatic philosophy, the Irrenite Heresy, and/or the Urgic Mysitics?). Basically, I'm asking if Oronthonism addresses the uniqueness of life/creation, and how the ramifications of that truth (Truth?) are applied within game/rules setting in which other gods, planes, demons, and non-divine philosophies/forces can power divine spells, planar energies, etc. (Does that make sense?). [/QUOTE]

Verification