Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Song of Rest Abuse?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 6849211" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>Naw. Human variant for the bonus feat on a lore bard grabs medium armor and shield if a person is worried anyway, just as an example. Most bards who are looking at combat focus on DEX anyway. It's usually a 14 or 15 AC on the bard or rogue at first compared to 16 AC for the heavy armor classes that might have the proficiency. 16 (18 with a shield) is high, not average, at first level. There are literally only 2 classes with heavy armor proficiency (plus some clerics by domain bonus proficiency) and every other class is looking at the same AC as the bard options or less. Shield proficiency is a bit more common but not commonly used in favor of damage from weapons requiring two hands or the two weapon fighting style.</p><p></p><p>Almost every class is looking at STR or DEX for combat, CON for hit points, and another attribute score. That's not different for bards. Going with DEX, CHA, and CON on a bard isn't different than STR, CHA, and CON on a paladin; or STR, DEX, CON on a barbarian; or DEX, WIS, CON on a ranger; or DEX, WIS, CON on a monk; etc to demonstrate the same thing happens.</p><p></p><p>The typical party only has one or two classes with slightly higher AC at those levels, and levels 1 & 2 go by very quickly regardless.</p><p></p><p>The abundance of spells from versatile options and bardic inspiration easily cover quite a bit of ground. The entire party can also be stealth based. Running a group stealth check that would only require 3/5 characters to beat the highest passive perception opposing them when the group is all bard with some DEX investment works well, especially if they focus on it more with expertise and invisibility later. It may have been a comment made in jest, but bards aren't hurting for AC compared to most classes. A typical group would be a wizard who had cast mage armor (AC 15), rogue (AC 14 or 15), fighter with a big weapon (AC 16), and a cleric with a 15 or 16 AC who is more likely to take a shield bonus, plus something else similar in those same AC's. The bards have more overall magical firepower, healing, and buffs; and each would be TWF for better damage than the wizard or cleric is contributing. Parties with 5 rogues, 5 bards, or 5 rangers are examples that work well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 6849211, member: 6750235"] Naw. Human variant for the bonus feat on a lore bard grabs medium armor and shield if a person is worried anyway, just as an example. Most bards who are looking at combat focus on DEX anyway. It's usually a 14 or 15 AC on the bard or rogue at first compared to 16 AC for the heavy armor classes that might have the proficiency. 16 (18 with a shield) is high, not average, at first level. There are literally only 2 classes with heavy armor proficiency (plus some clerics by domain bonus proficiency) and every other class is looking at the same AC as the bard options or less. Shield proficiency is a bit more common but not commonly used in favor of damage from weapons requiring two hands or the two weapon fighting style. Almost every class is looking at STR or DEX for combat, CON for hit points, and another attribute score. That's not different for bards. Going with DEX, CHA, and CON on a bard isn't different than STR, CHA, and CON on a paladin; or STR, DEX, CON on a barbarian; or DEX, WIS, CON on a ranger; or DEX, WIS, CON on a monk; etc to demonstrate the same thing happens. The typical party only has one or two classes with slightly higher AC at those levels, and levels 1 & 2 go by very quickly regardless. The abundance of spells from versatile options and bardic inspiration easily cover quite a bit of ground. The entire party can also be stealth based. Running a group stealth check that would only require 3/5 characters to beat the highest passive perception opposing them when the group is all bard with some DEX investment works well, especially if they focus on it more with expertise and invisibility later. It may have been a comment made in jest, but bards aren't hurting for AC compared to most classes. A typical group would be a wizard who had cast mage armor (AC 15), rogue (AC 14 or 15), fighter with a big weapon (AC 16), and a cleric with a 15 or 16 AC who is more likely to take a shield bonus, plus something else similar in those same AC's. The bards have more overall magical firepower, healing, and buffs; and each would be TWF for better damage than the wizard or cleric is contributing. Parties with 5 rogues, 5 bards, or 5 rangers are examples that work well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Song of Rest Abuse?
Top