Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sorcerer Fix - Continued from "D&D Rules" (PART 3)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Khaalis" data-source="post: 1412523" data-attributes="member: 2167"><p>I am sorry if you feel you were “dismissed”. I never dismiss anything on purpose. I (and others) may have disagreed with your assessments but always with comments and reasons why. Your views just didn’t match the majority view of where the class was going which is probably why you felt dismissed even though the points were addressed.</p><p></p><p>I understand, and have repeatedly stated, that not everyone can be pleased by a class design. There is NO such thing as the perfect class. People even attempt to re-write the most basic class in the game (the Fighter) because people can’t even agree on <u>that class</u>, much less something as controversial as the sorcerer. </p><p></p><p>On Genericism - This design build does include a generic Sorcerer. If people such as yourself wish to have only a generic sorcerer – they can use the unknown lineage template or the draconic lineage (etc.) - absorbing into the “core” write-up and all else dropped as options if that is what they really wished to do. That is why the class is built as it is. It allows customization ability but in the design principle of a simple class design. This same basic premise is used in <u>Arcana Unearthed</u> with the Witch and Totem Warrior classes. You are of course welcome to write your own version. As I have said in the past, you wouldn’t be the 1st nor the last.</p><p></p><p>As for the length of the base class write-up… in actuality, if you compare the two write-ups from “Class Features” onward (not including the table and flavor text and skills), the core class is (at about Size 8 font) 0.75 pages long or about 2 pages long with the full familiar sidebar information included. The core material here is just under 1 page so it is, in fact just about the same length or shorter than the PHB material.</p><p></p><p>The lineages are also not to be included in the core class write-up. They are an addendum addition, similar to Domains. The lineages are examples, and by no means exhaustive – also similar to domains, and can be expounded on at will by others.</p><p>As for the length of the lineages… what is so complex about them? They are quite simple in design but I have attempted to make them clear and unambiguous unlike some of the PHB rules.</p><p><strong>Name:</strong> Description</p><p><strong>Benefits:</strong></p><p><strong>Special Limitations:</strong></p><p><strong>Lineage Spells:</strong></p><p><strong>Lineage Abilities:</strong> 8th, 14th, 20th</p><p></p><p>Hope that helps some.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Khaalis, post: 1412523, member: 2167"] I am sorry if you feel you were “dismissed”. I never dismiss anything on purpose. I (and others) may have disagreed with your assessments but always with comments and reasons why. Your views just didn’t match the majority view of where the class was going which is probably why you felt dismissed even though the points were addressed. I understand, and have repeatedly stated, that not everyone can be pleased by a class design. There is NO such thing as the perfect class. People even attempt to re-write the most basic class in the game (the Fighter) because people can’t even agree on [u]that class[/u], much less something as controversial as the sorcerer. On Genericism - This design build does include a generic Sorcerer. If people such as yourself wish to have only a generic sorcerer – they can use the unknown lineage template or the draconic lineage (etc.) - absorbing into the “core” write-up and all else dropped as options if that is what they really wished to do. That is why the class is built as it is. It allows customization ability but in the design principle of a simple class design. This same basic premise is used in [u]Arcana Unearthed[/u] with the Witch and Totem Warrior classes. You are of course welcome to write your own version. As I have said in the past, you wouldn’t be the 1st nor the last. As for the length of the base class write-up… in actuality, if you compare the two write-ups from “Class Features” onward (not including the table and flavor text and skills), the core class is (at about Size 8 font) 0.75 pages long or about 2 pages long with the full familiar sidebar information included. The core material here is just under 1 page so it is, in fact just about the same length or shorter than the PHB material. The lineages are also not to be included in the core class write-up. They are an addendum addition, similar to Domains. The lineages are examples, and by no means exhaustive – also similar to domains, and can be expounded on at will by others. As for the length of the lineages… what is so complex about them? They are quite simple in design but I have attempted to make them clear and unambiguous unlike some of the PHB rules. [b]Name:[/b] Description [b]Benefits:[/b] [b]Special Limitations:[/b] [b]Lineage Spells:[/b] [b]Lineage Abilities:[/b] 8th, 14th, 20th Hope that helps some. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sorcerer Fix - Continued from "D&D Rules" (PART 3)
Top