Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fuindordm" data-source="post: 1354210" data-attributes="member: 5435">Now now...Heh.&nbsp; You must admit, the sorcerer domain systems were a lot less radical than this.Basically, we were restricting half a socerer's spell selection to a theme chosen by the player, and giving them a couple of minor bonus powers in exchange for the lost versatility.&nbsp; The changeswere minor enough that we could be sure balance wasn't affected, even when we robbed spells from other class lists to fill out the domains.This version does a lot more to set sorcerers apart, I must admit, and in much more of a Whiz-Bang-Cool! way. I'm not so sure about the game balance though; the minor powers seem OK, while some of the major ones effectively grant the PC an extra utility spell that might not have made it onto their primary list.Good work, everyone. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> --Ben Mathiesen</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fuindordm, post: 1354210, member: 5435"] [b]Now now...[/b] Heh. You must admit, the sorcerer domain systems were a lot less radical than this. Basically, we were restricting half a socerer's spell selection to a theme chosen by the player, and giving them a couple of minor bonus powers in exchange for the lost versatility. The changes were minor enough that we could be sure balance wasn't affected, even when we robbed spells from other class lists to fill out the domains. This version does a lot more to set sorcerers apart, I must admit, and in much more of a Whiz-Bang-Cool! way. I'm not so sure about the game balance though; the minor powers seem OK, while some of the major ones effectively grant the PC an extra utility spell that might not have made it onto their primary list. Good work, everyone. :-) --Ben Mathiesen [/QUOTE]

Verification