Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 5995165" data-attributes="member: 59057">I don´t know if it makes sense that there are lists A-X. You still need to add words to spells. It is not so difficult to expand the List of spells each time a book is published.Maybe later there will be classes that need spell list F, but those spells are still appropriate for a wizard.Also I don´t believe it is bad, that a sorcerer lacks one level of spells behind. Its the same in 3e. The wizard is the arcane powerouse. He should have his advantage.Also I think, the spell disruption rules are ok. But I still would like to see the damage mechanic back that makes wizards have a harder time casting spells if they were damaged. Right now, a fighter can run close up to make wizards life harder, but in a 1 on 1, it does not help him all that much, especially now, that the ranged attack rules only apply disadvantage to ranged WEAPON attacks. So now every spell is just jeduced to a close/melee spell. I don´t see why adding keywords would make it easier here.</blockquote>