Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribe" data-source="post: 8193026" data-attributes="member: 6807152">Yeah, I dont like Warlock at Charisma at all.Wizard: Has to be Int.Sorcerer: I cannot see them as anything but Charisma.Bard: Makes too much sense as Charisma.Paladin: I'd actually put them back on Wisdom. I know Charisma works too, but I dont mind Paladins being pulled in a bunch of different directions.Warlock: I was thinking on this the other day. Pact's are not Charisma. You are making a deal. You are binding, or bound, and you get something out of it. Actually now that I think of it, this could be the Constitution based Arcane, as the magic is bound to your flesh? They also do not have the historical baggage around casting with armour, they have for more 'go ahead and swing instead of cast' logic.I dont know, sitting and thinking on it, thats who I would move out to Constitution, for a tanky melee/blaster hybrid. Actually I like it a lot now that I think on it.I've seen whole parties of Charisma Classes, it just seems flooded, Warlock at Constitution...I will need to make a note and think on that some more. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>