Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 2636370" data-attributes="member: 3929">True, I was just trying to communicate immediacy, which the sorc is better at.The Sorcerer wouldn't bring down the Prismatic Wall, that's not what I had intended for you to think ... the sorcerer would bypass it quickly, eliminating the need to bring it down.Unless it absolutly needs to be taken down. In which case, you're in better hands with 15 minutes and a wizard.So you have an artillery sorcerer, since he wants him most powerful spells to be blast spells. Of course an artillery sorcerer is going to be less versatile than a wizard.And Lightning Bolt will work just fine against Trolls... they will recieve subdual damage out the wazoo, and once they're down they're helpless, subject to CdG. Or getting their head cut off, if your DM allows that common house rule.I would suggest that what matters most is how all of his spells together work in concert, and not just his highest level spells.As you say.Is that while still dismissing the threats of spellbook loss and midnight attack, as you did a few posts up?If you need versatility, then the sorcerer is the sub-optimal choice. That isn't the point of this thread, nor is it the source of disagreement here, so you certainly don't need to quote yourself to say it again any more.</blockquote>