Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
Sorceror build question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dan'L" data-source="post: 4796371" data-attributes="member: 68954"><p>I understand that the power itself does not give a "melee basic attack." But this really only addresses one third of the ABC list you present. My question was does the feat affect the ranged nature of the power to the extent that it affects the "Special" clause (10). I have given my reasoning on this in that previous post, and it encompasses the effects of the feat and the power working in tandem; I am interested in insight that addresses the two together.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do not mean to do this; I simply mean to examine the entirety of the thought process and rules in a point/counterpoint fashion. I am seeking to understand, and sometimes it is best to be clear about one's own thought processes so that others may offer appropriate insight.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I'm sorry; I really did not intend it to be; I was completely sincere in what I wrote, and I truly apologize if it was rude. In (1) and (3) I was addressing proper terminology and usage as it pertains to these rule issues in an attempt at clarity and understanding. In (2),I was sincerely thanking him for clearing up my confusion, as I had asked him to do earlier and he graciously did. In (4) I was clarifying my intentions at asking the question initially, as it appeared that there was an inference going that I wanted to take SBC explicitly for gaining Acid Orb as an MBA. And, finally, in (5) I was attempting to draw an analogy to help me understand the presented POV, hence the "?" to indicate the doubt that I was unsure if I was understanding it correctly.</p><p></p><p>I attempt to be thorough in conveying my thought process, so that there may be less confusion and misunderstanding. I realize, however, that the irony has become that this thoroughness itself may be misconstrued as condescending and rude.<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p></p><p>So, please accept with all true sincerity my apology for any rudeness, both to you and the previous posters. It is not intended, and I am truly thankful to all who take the time to help me to better understand this question.</p><p></p><p>-Dan'L</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dan'L, post: 4796371, member: 68954"] I understand that the power itself does not give a "melee basic attack." But this really only addresses one third of the ABC list you present. My question was does the feat affect the ranged nature of the power to the extent that it affects the "Special" clause (10). I have given my reasoning on this in that previous post, and it encompasses the effects of the feat and the power working in tandem; I am interested in insight that addresses the two together. I do not mean to do this; I simply mean to examine the entirety of the thought process and rules in a point/counterpoint fashion. I am seeking to understand, and sometimes it is best to be clear about one's own thought processes so that others may offer appropriate insight. I'm sorry; I really did not intend it to be; I was completely sincere in what I wrote, and I truly apologize if it was rude. In (1) and (3) I was addressing proper terminology and usage as it pertains to these rule issues in an attempt at clarity and understanding. In (2),I was sincerely thanking him for clearing up my confusion, as I had asked him to do earlier and he graciously did. In (4) I was clarifying my intentions at asking the question initially, as it appeared that there was an inference going that I wanted to take SBC explicitly for gaining Acid Orb as an MBA. And, finally, in (5) I was attempting to draw an analogy to help me understand the presented POV, hence the "?" to indicate the doubt that I was unsure if I was understanding it correctly. I attempt to be thorough in conveying my thought process, so that there may be less confusion and misunderstanding. I realize, however, that the irony has become that this thoroughness itself may be misconstrued as condescending and rude.:erm: So, please accept with all true sincerity my apology for any rudeness, both to you and the previous posters. It is not intended, and I am truly thankful to all who take the time to help me to better understand this question. -Dan'L [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
Sorceror build question
Top