Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sorceror in current edition worse than wizard?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 818805" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>I'm going to have to take issue with the "demolisher, but little else" description of the Sorcerer in the first post, and in some subsequent ones. I played a Sorcerer for a long time, and they're far more than that.</p><p></p><p>Taking the Shadow magic spells covers a lot of the Sorcerers low-level flexibility problems, but even that's not important; a well-designed Sorcerer has at least one utility spell at every level. Look at level 3 spells, for example; everyone knows to take some combination of Haste, Fly, Dispel Magic, Fireball, and Lightning Bolt, right? But, sacrifice one of those for something like Tongues, Protection from Elements, or Clairvoyance, and you'll be far more useful to the party, because these are spells too specific for the other casters to memorize, but that can be really useful in many situations.</p><p></p><p>In fact, my Sorcerer had almost no damage spells, since he was all about nondamaging attack spells and utility, leaving the blasting to the Wizard of the group. The point is, though, anyone who designs a Sorcerer solely around throwing tons of Fireballs is really underutilizing the main advantage of the Sorcerer, their spellcasting flexibility.</p><p></p><p>And IMC we're with these other guys on the BBB train: it shouldn't make scribing free. Note the "shouldn't", not "doesn't"; it's a terrible idea for game balance to remove scribing costs, since it removes one of the biggest balance features for a class altogether, but the rules are vague.</p><p>Now, the problem here is, if you still have to pay per Boccob's page, how many pages does it have? How many pages does each spell take? All it says is "45 spells of any level", not "45 pages and 1 spell per page".</p><p>So, I see three options:</p><p>A> BBB has 45 pages, and each spell takes 1 page</p><p>B> BBB has 100 pages like a standard spellbook, and each spell takes 2 pages, with 10 pages unusable for spells (this one isn't really an interpretation, it's more of "nice house rule I've seen")</p><p>C> Even with a BBB you still use 2 pages per spell level, the book has an infinite number of pages, but can only hold 45 spells.</p><p></p><p>Either A or B still leave it much cheaper to scribe than a standard spellbook.</p><p>C is the same cost as usual (you're only saving on convenience, not having to haul around a half-dozen books). Personally I'd go with B for balance purposes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 818805, member: 3051"] I'm going to have to take issue with the "demolisher, but little else" description of the Sorcerer in the first post, and in some subsequent ones. I played a Sorcerer for a long time, and they're far more than that. Taking the Shadow magic spells covers a lot of the Sorcerers low-level flexibility problems, but even that's not important; a well-designed Sorcerer has at least one utility spell at every level. Look at level 3 spells, for example; everyone knows to take some combination of Haste, Fly, Dispel Magic, Fireball, and Lightning Bolt, right? But, sacrifice one of those for something like Tongues, Protection from Elements, or Clairvoyance, and you'll be far more useful to the party, because these are spells too specific for the other casters to memorize, but that can be really useful in many situations. In fact, my Sorcerer had almost no damage spells, since he was all about nondamaging attack spells and utility, leaving the blasting to the Wizard of the group. The point is, though, anyone who designs a Sorcerer solely around throwing tons of Fireballs is really underutilizing the main advantage of the Sorcerer, their spellcasting flexibility. And IMC we're with these other guys on the BBB train: it shouldn't make scribing free. Note the "shouldn't", not "doesn't"; it's a terrible idea for game balance to remove scribing costs, since it removes one of the biggest balance features for a class altogether, but the rules are vague. Now, the problem here is, if you still have to pay per Boccob's page, how many pages does it have? How many pages does each spell take? All it says is "45 spells of any level", not "45 pages and 1 spell per page". So, I see three options: A> BBB has 45 pages, and each spell takes 1 page B> BBB has 100 pages like a standard spellbook, and each spell takes 2 pages, with 10 pages unusable for spells (this one isn't really an interpretation, it's more of "nice house rule I've seen") C> Even with a BBB you still use 2 pages per spell level, the book has an infinite number of pages, but can only hold 45 spells. Either A or B still leave it much cheaper to scribe than a standard spellbook. C is the same cost as usual (you're only saving on convenience, not having to haul around a half-dozen books). Personally I'd go with B for balance purposes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sorceror in current edition worse than wizard?
Top