Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sorcerors in d&d
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hopeless" data-source="post: 3117474" data-attributes="member: 36349"><p><strong>Sorceror's in d&d</strong></p><p></p><p>Quote:</p><p>Originally Posted by hopelessShe picked up Read Magic at 2nd since the dm decided Sorcerors were dependent on scrolls for spells</p><p>What do you mean by this? Do you mean that your Sorcerer can only learn new spells if she has a scroll of the spell from which to learn them? (If that's the case, retire the character and start a new one. Your DM has just nerfed the weakest class rather spectacularly.)</p><p></p><p>Yes that’s pretty much what I thought but up to that point there had been only 3 sorcerors’ run at that club.</p><p></p><p>The first was when my cleric was aged 60 years by means of 2nd edition rules in a 3.0 game although the charcter was originally 2nd editon before being converted over.</p><p>The 2nd was run by a new player whose charcter was blown up after levitating down a pit filled with positive energy and the dm almost killed off my cleric/sorceror as well after first stating you had to gain a significant amount of extra hp before it happened and then tried to do it when my character went 1hp over.</p><p>This halfling is the third.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The toughness feat is great for a first level sorcerer but as you go up levels it becomes pretty useless. I wouldn't recommend anyone taking it.</p><p></p><p>I took toughness because I expected a high mortality rate since there was 9 players (Half Orc Barbarians x2, Human Bard, Cleric and Monk x1, Half Orc Druid x1, Dwarven Fighter x1, Elven Fighter x1, Halfling Sorceress x1 and later on after the Bard and two Barbarian’s players stopped coming a Human Rogue and 2 Elven Rangers were added in their stead.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why did you take Extend Spell? As far as I can tell, all it is doing at the moment is allowing you to use a first level spell slot to cast an extended dancing lights or an extended detect magic, which isn't very useful.</p><p></p><p>Originally the choice was between Enlarge spell, Energy Substitution and Extend spell since I was trying to run my character without a dependency on material spell components and hoped to pick up Eschew Material either at 6th level or having got the dm to let me use a variant rule for Summon Familiar from the Book of Familiars wher it gave me a bonus feat from a limited list at 3rd, 9th and 15th level to see if he'd allow me to swap the lot for a single bonus feat.</p><p></p><p>I like the various heritage feats in Complete Arcane and Players Handbook 2 (and apparently Complete Mage), and the bloodline feats from Dragon Compendium, but if you don't have access to those books its a moot point.</p><p></p><p>I've got some of those but doubt he'd allow it since it was a 3.0 game not 3.5</p><p></p><p>I have always found improved initiative to be a useful feat for spellcasters.</p><p>My experience is that its not the first person to act who wins but the last one standing and after having my cleric/sorceror avoid a 2nd edition rules flame strike scroll in a 3.0 game because he was casting spells before moving and the dm running that game declared you could only make a 5' move if you did cast before moving something that I believe only applies to metamagic only.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Spell selection is an area where opinions differ, and there isn't a "best" choice.</p><p>Personally, I think sleep is a more useful first level attacking spell as it affects more opponents (and a solitary 1d4+1 magic missile isn't very impressive).</p><p></p><p>I used starting funds to buy a single spell scroll and a potion of cure light wounds, that scroll by the way was sleep and I designed my character’s mentor explaining he had scribed the scroll so it had a higher saving throw DC still only effected 2 goblins though (bad roll).</p><p>My original intention was to cover up the restriction on spells known, but that was before I discovered he believed Sorcerors were dependent on Wizards for their spells since Sorcerors aren't normally inclined to take item creation feats...</p><p>My cleric/sorceror however picked up Scribe Scroll and Brew Ingestibles from Bastion Press's Alchemists' & Herbalists only to hav e the dm declare it only counted as brew potion even though he agreed to my feat selection in the first place (Brew Ingestibles as long as it doesn't provide hp or save bonus has a reduced costs along with a couple of different ways of brewing to reduce cost all of which he ignored because he couldn't be bother to read the copied information with my character sheet)</p><p></p><p>I also think mage armour is a better defensive spell than shield, as its longer duration means you can cast it in advance, rather than having to wait until combat is imminent. (Also, if you have a monk in the party, consider casting it on them as well - it will give you a friend for life.)</p><p></p><p>I later bought 2 of those and cast both on the Monk, along with a Protection from Evil scroll, would like to buy more but would really like to mult-class as both Cleric and Wizard so I can get the feat and the spells and not be bound to the material component problem.</p><p> </p><p>As a halfling, presumably your AC is pretty good anyway, so you might have foregone a defensive spell completely in order to have two offensive spells, such as sleep and magic missile.</p><p></p><p>She has a Dex of 16 and I went for Shield because it was a 3.0 game and a +7 to AC and +3 to Reflex saves is a nice modifier. Of course Mage Armour was on the list once I could get Eshew Material so Id din't have to rip suits of leather or hide to pieces.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't bother with identify; much better to have another utility spell or effect spell - something </p><p></p><p>I chose it because she was the only arcane spellcaster and spending 125gp+ per casting of this spell since any npc worth their salt would want their money back and a scroll would only effect one item. In case you're wondering we found a big gold raft that was apparently unbreakable and unsinkable... how do I know that? Because I used up an identify spell at 3rd level and he refused to reveal anything other than its basic function even though a Wondrous Item with a permanent form of Stoneskin and Water Walk is hardly call to hide its nature from even an Identify spell. Had the game continued I planned on casting an Extended Detect Magic and make him admit what spells were present even if I had to cast it several times to locate all of its abilities. Somehow I suspect it was going to be stolen but thats just a suspicion for now.</p><p></p><p>Colour spray is a good area zap spell which remains potent into the future, for instance. Truestrike is a spell you can cast over and over again without it getting tired, unseen servant can do all kinds of useful little tasks and has a long duration...</p><p></p><p>Maybe but my character was steering away from material components.</p><p></p><p>Regarding feats - I agree that toughness is pretty pointless, and would recommend against it. That 3hp buffer isn't much if you get attacked by something at this level. I do think that there are metamagic feats that are worth taking straight away though - not extend spell, since it is so limited, but silent spell and/or still spell are great spells to be able to have at low level because they come up sometimes (like when you cast a silent ghost sound in order to distract someone without giving away your own position by the sound of your casting)</p><p></p><p>Silent and Still spell are nice but until I really need them, I don't think its wise to let people know I can cast spells without gestruing or speaking, but they are both on that restricted list of bonus feats I mentioned earlier.</p><p></p><p>Now, for the spell selection:</p><p>I always liked prestidigitation - one of the most useful level 0 spells I think. Forget read magic - either your DM reconsiders the part about sorcerers needing scrolls or you can forget sorcerers anyway.</p><p></p><p>I agree but went for Read Magic instead after being told of a sorceror's dependency.</p><p></p><p>Magic missile and shield are nice ones. Depending on what you want form it, you might want to exchange Shield for Mage Armour. It really depends on what you want to do with it. Mage armour lasts longer, but armour bonuses are easier to come buy with magic items, and the Shield takes care of magic missiles. Either one can work well, though.</p><p></p><p>Can't exchange spells under 3.0 but planned to go for both once I could get Eshew Material.</p><p></p><p>Identify is wasted I'd say, especially for a sorcerer and his limited spell selection. I second the colour spray idea. Charm person can also be useful to make friends.</p><p></p><p>I only went for it since I'm inclined to be honest, but some aren't and any dm worth his alt could stuff their players by making them pay for identify spells to be cast at a one for one basis. In case you've overlooked this the material component for an identify spell is a bottle of fine wine, an owl feather and a 100gp pearl, I'd like to see you buy a Scroll of Identify that didn't cost at least 125gp though...</p><p></p><p>If you're a sorcerer, hire an NPC to cast Identify. You need the slot.</p><p>And if that sorceror decides to walk off with a valuable magical item after all you're assuming they legitimate since if one person goes to them whats to stop them selling it off to someone else after persuading them its not worth a lot but he/she can find someone to buy it if they're interested?</p><p></p><p>I would go with Spell Focus instead of Toughness.</p><p></p><p>I'd agree except I had planned to multi-class initially before fidning myself the only arcaen spellcaster.</p><p></p><p>There's a good thread over at the Giant in the Playground boards about making an oober wizard. A lot of it is applicable to sorcerers, too. Goodman Games' Power-Gamers Guide to Mages is also quite good and you can't help but make a robust sorcerer reading it.</p><p></p><p>Got it, found it a little limited since there are far more archetypes than whats listed.</p><p></p><p>If you run a sorcerer you need to ask the DM a couple questions about magic item availability (i.e. are there magic shops with 'cheap' items available?):</p><p>Potions, Scrolls, Wands</p><p></p><p>He'd said there would be restrictions since he didn't like how available items were in the Faerun campaign. I'd planned around this by revealing my character's patron deity of Maia was the Halfling name for Ehlonna and I was using the Quintessential Halfling rules for clans so I could claim I could make contact with someone from home to purchase scrolls if they got hard to obtain but apparently he has no problem with scrolls and potions but have yet to find one that sells wands though.</p><p></p><p>If you're going to play a sorcerer just to toss around magic missile and other lame offensive spells, I'd recommend playing a warlock from the complete arcane instead. They're better and cooler.</p><p></p><p>Its a 3.0 game and Warlocks are 3.5 personally I think they're rather silly since any other class that casts darkness can't see through yet they allow Warlocks to be able to do so, did anyone bother to read up on what came before?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hopeless, post: 3117474, member: 36349"] [b]Sorceror's in d&d[/b] Quote: Originally Posted by hopelessShe picked up Read Magic at 2nd since the dm decided Sorcerors were dependent on scrolls for spells What do you mean by this? Do you mean that your Sorcerer can only learn new spells if she has a scroll of the spell from which to learn them? (If that's the case, retire the character and start a new one. Your DM has just nerfed the weakest class rather spectacularly.) Yes that’s pretty much what I thought but up to that point there had been only 3 sorcerors’ run at that club. The first was when my cleric was aged 60 years by means of 2nd edition rules in a 3.0 game although the charcter was originally 2nd editon before being converted over. The 2nd was run by a new player whose charcter was blown up after levitating down a pit filled with positive energy and the dm almost killed off my cleric/sorceror as well after first stating you had to gain a significant amount of extra hp before it happened and then tried to do it when my character went 1hp over. This halfling is the third. The toughness feat is great for a first level sorcerer but as you go up levels it becomes pretty useless. I wouldn't recommend anyone taking it. I took toughness because I expected a high mortality rate since there was 9 players (Half Orc Barbarians x2, Human Bard, Cleric and Monk x1, Half Orc Druid x1, Dwarven Fighter x1, Elven Fighter x1, Halfling Sorceress x1 and later on after the Bard and two Barbarian’s players stopped coming a Human Rogue and 2 Elven Rangers were added in their stead.) Why did you take Extend Spell? As far as I can tell, all it is doing at the moment is allowing you to use a first level spell slot to cast an extended dancing lights or an extended detect magic, which isn't very useful. Originally the choice was between Enlarge spell, Energy Substitution and Extend spell since I was trying to run my character without a dependency on material spell components and hoped to pick up Eschew Material either at 6th level or having got the dm to let me use a variant rule for Summon Familiar from the Book of Familiars wher it gave me a bonus feat from a limited list at 3rd, 9th and 15th level to see if he'd allow me to swap the lot for a single bonus feat. I like the various heritage feats in Complete Arcane and Players Handbook 2 (and apparently Complete Mage), and the bloodline feats from Dragon Compendium, but if you don't have access to those books its a moot point. I've got some of those but doubt he'd allow it since it was a 3.0 game not 3.5 I have always found improved initiative to be a useful feat for spellcasters. My experience is that its not the first person to act who wins but the last one standing and after having my cleric/sorceror avoid a 2nd edition rules flame strike scroll in a 3.0 game because he was casting spells before moving and the dm running that game declared you could only make a 5' move if you did cast before moving something that I believe only applies to metamagic only. Spell selection is an area where opinions differ, and there isn't a "best" choice. Personally, I think sleep is a more useful first level attacking spell as it affects more opponents (and a solitary 1d4+1 magic missile isn't very impressive). I used starting funds to buy a single spell scroll and a potion of cure light wounds, that scroll by the way was sleep and I designed my character’s mentor explaining he had scribed the scroll so it had a higher saving throw DC still only effected 2 goblins though (bad roll). My original intention was to cover up the restriction on spells known, but that was before I discovered he believed Sorcerors were dependent on Wizards for their spells since Sorcerors aren't normally inclined to take item creation feats... My cleric/sorceror however picked up Scribe Scroll and Brew Ingestibles from Bastion Press's Alchemists' & Herbalists only to hav e the dm declare it only counted as brew potion even though he agreed to my feat selection in the first place (Brew Ingestibles as long as it doesn't provide hp or save bonus has a reduced costs along with a couple of different ways of brewing to reduce cost all of which he ignored because he couldn't be bother to read the copied information with my character sheet) I also think mage armour is a better defensive spell than shield, as its longer duration means you can cast it in advance, rather than having to wait until combat is imminent. (Also, if you have a monk in the party, consider casting it on them as well - it will give you a friend for life.) I later bought 2 of those and cast both on the Monk, along with a Protection from Evil scroll, would like to buy more but would really like to mult-class as both Cleric and Wizard so I can get the feat and the spells and not be bound to the material component problem. As a halfling, presumably your AC is pretty good anyway, so you might have foregone a defensive spell completely in order to have two offensive spells, such as sleep and magic missile. She has a Dex of 16 and I went for Shield because it was a 3.0 game and a +7 to AC and +3 to Reflex saves is a nice modifier. Of course Mage Armour was on the list once I could get Eshew Material so Id din't have to rip suits of leather or hide to pieces. I wouldn't bother with identify; much better to have another utility spell or effect spell - something I chose it because she was the only arcane spellcaster and spending 125gp+ per casting of this spell since any npc worth their salt would want their money back and a scroll would only effect one item. In case you're wondering we found a big gold raft that was apparently unbreakable and unsinkable... how do I know that? Because I used up an identify spell at 3rd level and he refused to reveal anything other than its basic function even though a Wondrous Item with a permanent form of Stoneskin and Water Walk is hardly call to hide its nature from even an Identify spell. Had the game continued I planned on casting an Extended Detect Magic and make him admit what spells were present even if I had to cast it several times to locate all of its abilities. Somehow I suspect it was going to be stolen but thats just a suspicion for now. Colour spray is a good area zap spell which remains potent into the future, for instance. Truestrike is a spell you can cast over and over again without it getting tired, unseen servant can do all kinds of useful little tasks and has a long duration... Maybe but my character was steering away from material components. Regarding feats - I agree that toughness is pretty pointless, and would recommend against it. That 3hp buffer isn't much if you get attacked by something at this level. I do think that there are metamagic feats that are worth taking straight away though - not extend spell, since it is so limited, but silent spell and/or still spell are great spells to be able to have at low level because they come up sometimes (like when you cast a silent ghost sound in order to distract someone without giving away your own position by the sound of your casting) Silent and Still spell are nice but until I really need them, I don't think its wise to let people know I can cast spells without gestruing or speaking, but they are both on that restricted list of bonus feats I mentioned earlier. Now, for the spell selection: I always liked prestidigitation - one of the most useful level 0 spells I think. Forget read magic - either your DM reconsiders the part about sorcerers needing scrolls or you can forget sorcerers anyway. I agree but went for Read Magic instead after being told of a sorceror's dependency. Magic missile and shield are nice ones. Depending on what you want form it, you might want to exchange Shield for Mage Armour. It really depends on what you want to do with it. Mage armour lasts longer, but armour bonuses are easier to come buy with magic items, and the Shield takes care of magic missiles. Either one can work well, though. Can't exchange spells under 3.0 but planned to go for both once I could get Eshew Material. Identify is wasted I'd say, especially for a sorcerer and his limited spell selection. I second the colour spray idea. Charm person can also be useful to make friends. I only went for it since I'm inclined to be honest, but some aren't and any dm worth his alt could stuff their players by making them pay for identify spells to be cast at a one for one basis. In case you've overlooked this the material component for an identify spell is a bottle of fine wine, an owl feather and a 100gp pearl, I'd like to see you buy a Scroll of Identify that didn't cost at least 125gp though... If you're a sorcerer, hire an NPC to cast Identify. You need the slot. And if that sorceror decides to walk off with a valuable magical item after all you're assuming they legitimate since if one person goes to them whats to stop them selling it off to someone else after persuading them its not worth a lot but he/she can find someone to buy it if they're interested? I would go with Spell Focus instead of Toughness. I'd agree except I had planned to multi-class initially before fidning myself the only arcaen spellcaster. There's a good thread over at the Giant in the Playground boards about making an oober wizard. A lot of it is applicable to sorcerers, too. Goodman Games' Power-Gamers Guide to Mages is also quite good and you can't help but make a robust sorcerer reading it. Got it, found it a little limited since there are far more archetypes than whats listed. If you run a sorcerer you need to ask the DM a couple questions about magic item availability (i.e. are there magic shops with 'cheap' items available?): Potions, Scrolls, Wands He'd said there would be restrictions since he didn't like how available items were in the Faerun campaign. I'd planned around this by revealing my character's patron deity of Maia was the Halfling name for Ehlonna and I was using the Quintessential Halfling rules for clans so I could claim I could make contact with someone from home to purchase scrolls if they got hard to obtain but apparently he has no problem with scrolls and potions but have yet to find one that sells wands though. If you're going to play a sorcerer just to toss around magic missile and other lame offensive spells, I'd recommend playing a warlock from the complete arcane instead. They're better and cooler. Its a 3.0 game and Warlocks are 3.5 personally I think they're rather silly since any other class that casts darkness can't see through yet they allow Warlocks to be able to do so, did anyone bother to read up on what came before? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sorcerors in d&d
Top