Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sort weapon table by...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 9237278" data-attributes="member: 7040132"><p>The current organizational format is correct, in my opinion. The designers have it right.</p><p></p><p>The purpose of a list should be for easy reference purposes, and if there are multiple lists, their categories should prioritized based on the most macro-sized choices to be made, down to the last choice.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Simple and Martial should be separated at the highest level because the earliest and most macro decision to make is at level 1, because EVERY class differentiates proficiency based on Simple vs. Martial Weapons. Most spellcasters do not need to be sifting through all the Martial Weapons. Armor is the same way (Light, Medium, Heavy, and Shield). </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Melee and ranged are the next biggest differentiator, based on basic functionality.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Within those lists, it should be alphabetical based on the first column of the list (which means alphabetical by weapon name). A new player does not have the system mastery to know to look up weapons based on other damage/mastery/properties.</li> </ol> <ul style="margin-left: 20px"> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sorting by damage first will be less than helpful anyone who does not use Martial weapons.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sorting by Mastery is not helpful to anyone that doesn't use Mastery, therefore it should not be a primary differentiator.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sorting by Properties is not important to most classes or species that don't differentiate proficiency or function by property. Some weapons don't have properties/masteries, so where do they fit in the list? First? Last?</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mirrorrorrim, post: 9237278, member: 7040132"] The current organizational format is correct, in my opinion. The designers have it right. The purpose of a list should be for easy reference purposes, and if there are multiple lists, their categories should prioritized based on the most macro-sized choices to be made, down to the last choice. [LIST=1] [*]Simple and Martial should be separated at the highest level because the earliest and most macro decision to make is at level 1, because EVERY class differentiates proficiency based on Simple vs. Martial Weapons. Most spellcasters do not need to be sifting through all the Martial Weapons. Armor is the same way (Light, Medium, Heavy, and Shield). [*]Melee and ranged are the next biggest differentiator, based on basic functionality. [*]Within those lists, it should be alphabetical based on the first column of the list (which means alphabetical by weapon name). A new player does not have the system mastery to know to look up weapons based on other damage/mastery/properties. [/LIST] [INDENT][LIST] [*]Sorting by damage first will be less than helpful anyone who does not use Martial weapons. [*]Sorting by Mastery is not helpful to anyone that doesn't use Mastery, therefore it should not be a primary differentiator. [*]Sorting by Properties is not important to most classes or species that don't differentiate proficiency or function by property. Some weapons don't have properties/masteries, so where do they fit in the list? First? Last? [/LIST][/INDENT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sort weapon table by...
Top