Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Soulknife Knack problems (Is it incredibly powerful?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shiroiken" data-source="post: 8133306" data-attributes="member: 6775477"><p>This is an oddly worded ability apparently (I haven't seen the actual text). If it doesn't cost anything when it doesn't help, why would you not choose to use it on checks you think are really important. Thus it could have simply been worded: "before making an ability check, you may spend [resource] to add [dice] to the result of the check. If the outcome of success doesn't change, you regain the spent resource." Oh well.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Your players could simply choose to act correctly in-character. The PCs don't have the information, so the players shouldn't act as if they do. Our group does this, and it's sometime hilarious when one player succeeded with Insight, but most of the party failed. Everyone knows the truth, but the only person who succeeded has to find a way to convince the party of it.</p><p></p><p>Another option is to set the DCs of impossible tasks (finding a door/creature that doesn't exist) infinitely high, allowing the player to use the ability, which won't affect the outcome. Social skills are a bit different, and I would simply ask after a roll "do you want to use Knack?" If they do and it doesn't matter, then they don't spend the resource.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shiroiken, post: 8133306, member: 6775477"] This is an oddly worded ability apparently (I haven't seen the actual text). If it doesn't cost anything when it doesn't help, why would you not choose to use it on checks you think are really important. Thus it could have simply been worded: "before making an ability check, you may spend [resource] to add [dice] to the result of the check. If the outcome of success doesn't change, you regain the spent resource." Oh well. Your players could simply choose to act correctly in-character. The PCs don't have the information, so the players shouldn't act as if they do. Our group does this, and it's sometime hilarious when one player succeeded with Insight, but most of the party failed. Everyone knows the truth, but the only person who succeeded has to find a way to convince the party of it. Another option is to set the DCs of impossible tasks (finding a door/creature that doesn't exist) infinitely high, allowing the player to use the ability, which won't affect the outcome. Social skills are a bit different, and I would simply ask after a roll "do you want to use Knack?" If they do and it doesn't matter, then they don't spend the resource. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Soulknife Knack problems (Is it incredibly powerful?)
Top