Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Soulknife Knack problems (Is it incredibly powerful?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 8133526" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>That is too binary a picture. The meaning of game rules is informally decided normatively, and may be formally decided through appeal to authority (for example, in a <em>Chess</em> tournament where the FIDE laws prevail). Considering the first category, rules fall all along a spectrum from "<em>nearly everyone understands this rule in this way</em>" to "<em>understanding is evenly divided</em>" (as with rules that are in language strictly ambiguous) to "<em>everyone has their own take on this rule</em>". Participants in rules discourse influence one another's understanding.</p><p></p><p>Depending where it falls, it can be justified to assert the normal understanding of a rule.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Game rules are constitutive. If you follow the view you advocate sincerely, then you do yourself a disservice: why play D&D at all? It would also seem to say that this discussion is in itself unjustified (including your contribution to it).</p><p></p><p>Your narrower point - that one might always find a group somewhere with an understanding representing a departure from the norm - is fair of course. Even such departures are not binary: understandings tend to be clustered - falling nearer and further from one another.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 8133526, member: 71699"] That is too binary a picture. The meaning of game rules is informally decided normatively, and may be formally decided through appeal to authority (for example, in a [I]Chess[/I] tournament where the FIDE laws prevail). Considering the first category, rules fall all along a spectrum from "[I]nearly everyone understands this rule in this way[/I]" to "[I]understanding is evenly divided[/I]" (as with rules that are in language strictly ambiguous) to "[I]everyone has their own take on this rule[/I]". Participants in rules discourse influence one another's understanding. Depending where it falls, it can be justified to assert the normal understanding of a rule. Game rules are constitutive. If you follow the view you advocate sincerely, then you do yourself a disservice: why play D&D at all? It would also seem to say that this discussion is in itself unjustified (including your contribution to it). Your narrower point - that one might always find a group somewhere with an understanding representing a departure from the norm - is fair of course. Even such departures are not binary: understandings tend to be clustered - falling nearer and further from one another. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Soulknife Knack problems (Is it incredibly powerful?)
Top