Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 9178025" data-attributes="member: 71699">Others such as [USER=7035460]@Tutara[/USER] have made the reasonable point that through opting into and overcoming a jumping challenge I have (potentially) shown my interest in jumping. Therefore give me improved jumping so I can take on bigger and more complex jumping challenges. That conceded, something observed when we work out what players like and give them more of it is that it can result in monotony which is as you say, imprisoning. I think it also makes less than ideal use of the game's design-space (assuming the game to contain some non-jumping mechanics, obviously not a given.)A good reward strategy for player-who-loves jumping is not all-jumping, it is mostly-jumping-sometimes-other. An always-other reward strategy risks frustrating some players. Still, I'm sympathetic to mixing it up. How does this then dovetail with your - I want to repeat the same challenge over and over theory?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 9178025, member: 71699"] Others such as [USER=7035460]@Tutara[/USER] have made the reasonable point that through opting into and overcoming a jumping challenge I have (potentially) shown my interest in jumping. Therefore give me improved jumping so I can take on bigger and more complex jumping challenges. That conceded, something observed when we work out what players like and give them more of it is that it can result in monotony which is as you say, imprisoning. I think it also makes less than ideal use of the game's design-space (assuming the game to contain some non-jumping mechanics, obviously not a given.) A good reward strategy for player-who-loves jumping is not [I]all-jumping[/I], it is [I]mostly-jumping-sometimes-other[/I]. An [I]always-other [/I]reward strategy risks frustrating some players. Still, I'm sympathetic to mixing it up. How does this then dovetail with your - I want to repeat the same challenge over and over theory? [/QUOTE]

Verification