Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Specialist wizards: Has anything been mentioned?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 6272083" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>Here's what I think they're doing. Pretend I'm a WotC employee (I'm not):</p><p></p><p>"The most important thing to us is that we cover all of the expected bases in our subclasses. Sometimes that means that certain classes will have more subclasses than others. We plan to reserve campaign specific or otherwise corner case subclasses for supplements, but we want to make sure that you don't need anything other than PHB to feel like your traditional D&D concept is supported."</p><p></p><p>So I expect we are going to have 8 wizard schools, and hopefully about that many cleric domains. The last playtest listed 5 domains (only statted 3), which just isn't enough to cover it. They need things like darkness, death, or trickery. Otherwise you can't represent a lot of well-known deities. As far as the other classes, I expect we will see as many as they feel they need. For instance, I believe they were initially thinking of having multiple fighter subclasses based on combat maneuvers, but at some point realized that if they had good maneuvers and choices of which you had available, they only needed one subclass for it.</p><p></p><p>Also, I'm pretty sure we can expect more subclasses for the core 4 than the others, because the other classes are pretty niche already. Druid hits both of the main concepts in its current 2 subclasses, and if they put in one more for a spirit shaman sort, there isn't a whole lot that doesn't cover. </p><p></p><p>My main concern is with the cleric domains, because I'm not sure they're going to come through on that end. They might decide that Death and Darkness are evil and shouldn't be in the PHB (as well as a paladin blackguard subclass). As long as they stick them in the DMG I'm more than happy. Just let me represent my world.</p><p></p><p>So I'm hopeful and optimistic about how the subclass coverage will turn out. But if my hopes <em>are</em> dashed I'll be very, very, unhappy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 6272083, member: 6677017"] Here's what I think they're doing. Pretend I'm a WotC employee (I'm not): "The most important thing to us is that we cover all of the expected bases in our subclasses. Sometimes that means that certain classes will have more subclasses than others. We plan to reserve campaign specific or otherwise corner case subclasses for supplements, but we want to make sure that you don't need anything other than PHB to feel like your traditional D&D concept is supported." So I expect we are going to have 8 wizard schools, and hopefully about that many cleric domains. The last playtest listed 5 domains (only statted 3), which just isn't enough to cover it. They need things like darkness, death, or trickery. Otherwise you can't represent a lot of well-known deities. As far as the other classes, I expect we will see as many as they feel they need. For instance, I believe they were initially thinking of having multiple fighter subclasses based on combat maneuvers, but at some point realized that if they had good maneuvers and choices of which you had available, they only needed one subclass for it. Also, I'm pretty sure we can expect more subclasses for the core 4 than the others, because the other classes are pretty niche already. Druid hits both of the main concepts in its current 2 subclasses, and if they put in one more for a spirit shaman sort, there isn't a whole lot that doesn't cover. My main concern is with the cleric domains, because I'm not sure they're going to come through on that end. They might decide that Death and Darkness are evil and shouldn't be in the PHB (as well as a paladin blackguard subclass). As long as they stick them in the DMG I'm more than happy. Just let me represent my world. So I'm hopeful and optimistic about how the subclass coverage will turn out. But if my hopes [I]are[/I] dashed I'll be very, very, unhappy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Specialist wizards: Has anything been mentioned?
Top