Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Specialist wizards: Has anything been mentioned?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 6272984" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>I haven't seen anything that says 5e isn't using this technique. Can you find a quote or something that says this? The only thing I've seen for sure is that every class that has even been in a PHB1 from any edition would be in the PHB for D&D Next and that they were trying to avoid having "as many" splat books.</p><p></p><p>However, I've also seen comments to the effect that a bunch of the optional rules they've been discussing online won't be in the PHB and will likely instead be in "some future product". So, they are definitely leaving some stuff out in order to put in future books.</p><p></p><p>Even if they are going to "publish the same way 1st-3rd editions did", I'm not sure what that even means. Not all the classes were in the PHB in any of those editions. Neither were all the races. Nor all the weapons, feats, spells, or anything else really. Each of those editions had books after the PHB that provided more options that weren't in the PHB.</p><p></p><p>The 3.5e player's handbook didn't have every class that had been printed before it even. They picked 11 classes that they felt they could fit into the PHB. The rest they left for future books. It even had a PHB 2. </p><p></p><p>There were no Barbarians in the 2e PHB even though it was a class in 1e. Neither were their Cavaliers. Both were added in later books as kits.</p><p></p><p>In 1e there were no specialist Wizards. You could be a Magic-User or an Illusionist. So, it was incomplete since it didn't contain specialists in every school. Publishing in the tried and true method of 1e means they only need 2 subclasses of Wizard then.</p><p></p><p>Half-Orcs as a race weren't in the 2e PHB either. They added them in later books.</p><p></p><p>I honestly see no difference in the way that 4e printed than any other editions. They picked a slightly different point to split the classes and races from the first book to future books. But choosing not to put some stuff in the PHB and leaving it for later has been a staple of every edition since the beginning.</p><p></p><p>How much will be in the PHB for D&D Next? No idea. I think it mainly depends on the time they have to work on it, the price point of the book, what they think people will be able to tolerate being without, and so on. However, expecting EVERYTHING to be in the PHB is a recipe for disappointment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 6272984, member: 5143"] I haven't seen anything that says 5e isn't using this technique. Can you find a quote or something that says this? The only thing I've seen for sure is that every class that has even been in a PHB1 from any edition would be in the PHB for D&D Next and that they were trying to avoid having "as many" splat books. However, I've also seen comments to the effect that a bunch of the optional rules they've been discussing online won't be in the PHB and will likely instead be in "some future product". So, they are definitely leaving some stuff out in order to put in future books. Even if they are going to "publish the same way 1st-3rd editions did", I'm not sure what that even means. Not all the classes were in the PHB in any of those editions. Neither were all the races. Nor all the weapons, feats, spells, or anything else really. Each of those editions had books after the PHB that provided more options that weren't in the PHB. The 3.5e player's handbook didn't have every class that had been printed before it even. They picked 11 classes that they felt they could fit into the PHB. The rest they left for future books. It even had a PHB 2. There were no Barbarians in the 2e PHB even though it was a class in 1e. Neither were their Cavaliers. Both were added in later books as kits. In 1e there were no specialist Wizards. You could be a Magic-User or an Illusionist. So, it was incomplete since it didn't contain specialists in every school. Publishing in the tried and true method of 1e means they only need 2 subclasses of Wizard then. Half-Orcs as a race weren't in the 2e PHB either. They added them in later books. I honestly see no difference in the way that 4e printed than any other editions. They picked a slightly different point to split the classes and races from the first book to future books. But choosing not to put some stuff in the PHB and leaving it for later has been a staple of every edition since the beginning. How much will be in the PHB for D&D Next? No idea. I think it mainly depends on the time they have to work on it, the price point of the book, what they think people will be able to tolerate being without, and so on. However, expecting EVERYTHING to be in the PHB is a recipe for disappointment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Specialist wizards: Has anything been mentioned?
Top