Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Speculation on the missing quasielemental planes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 7954192" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>Actually, the model that debuted the quasi-elemental planes came <em>after</em> the sphere model to which you refer; it's more of a cubic model. </p><p></p><p>In any case, bear in mind that any picture we've had of the planes is one created by mortal scholars to impose a sense of structure on them. I don't take it as given that the model actually represents the arrangement of the planes in anything but the most approximate sense- especially since we've seen multiple different changing models over the years and editions. So I would posit that arrangement of the planes is not simply three-dimensional, as implied by the sphere/cube models, especially as each plane is literally infinite. Instead, I'll offer the idea that the plane of Temporal Energy is at 'right angles' to the elemental planes in yet a different direction than the Positive and Negative Energy Planes are. In other words, I'm happy to make the assumption that the planar arrangement is in four or more dimensions, rather than being one we can fully visualize.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is only true if you discard the notion that there are more ways to be connected than we can visualize in three dimensions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>During the era of the sphere model, both of those were considered to be demiplanes, so I don't think the analogy holds. Sure, there's no plane of shadow + earth- and even with the post-3e Shadowfell, they don't connect- but shadow isn't a plane of energy. Time is (at least, using the model I have chosen).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 7954192, member: 1210"] Actually, the model that debuted the quasi-elemental planes came [i]after[/i] the sphere model to which you refer; it's more of a cubic model. In any case, bear in mind that any picture we've had of the planes is one created by mortal scholars to impose a sense of structure on them. I don't take it as given that the model actually represents the arrangement of the planes in anything but the most approximate sense- especially since we've seen multiple different changing models over the years and editions. So I would posit that arrangement of the planes is not simply three-dimensional, as implied by the sphere/cube models, especially as each plane is literally infinite. Instead, I'll offer the idea that the plane of Temporal Energy is at 'right angles' to the elemental planes in yet a different direction than the Positive and Negative Energy Planes are. In other words, I'm happy to make the assumption that the planar arrangement is in four or more dimensions, rather than being one we can fully visualize. This is only true if you discard the notion that there are more ways to be connected than we can visualize in three dimensions. During the era of the sphere model, both of those were considered to be demiplanes, so I don't think the analogy holds. Sure, there's no plane of shadow + earth- and even with the post-3e Shadowfell, they don't connect- but shadow isn't a plane of energy. Time is (at least, using the model I have chosen). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Speculation on the missing quasielemental planes
Top