Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Speculation on the Remaining UAs in 2017
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6975244" data-attributes="member: 92511"><p>Some interesting thoughts in here...some I agree with...</p><p></p><p>Next: I think there's a good chance we'll see "Mystic #3" next. That's where it falls in the alphabetical order. They clearly want to get a psychic class introduced into the game. It would be nice if they put out something in UA that was complete and thorough and, well, tested and vetted for flavor and crunch with a sufficient number of subclasses to give [most] psychic fans what they're looking for all at once.</p><p></p><p>Then, I reeeally wouldn't mind, to be honest, if they SKIPPED Ranger altogether. We have two different "base" rangers. We have, what at this point, a half dozen or so subclass options. They've already done 3 UA's on the Ranger. ENOUGH already!</p><p></p><p>Rogue: I'd love to see how they'd do a committed<em> <strong>Acrobat</strong></em> subclass, but I doubt it would happen. I'm kind of at a loss for other Roguish optinos. <em><strong>A "divine 1/3rd caster"</strong></em> equivalent to the Arcane Trickster would be expected. Whether that's Inquisitor" or Avenger or "Assassin's Creed" in flavor/slant I can not say. An <em><strong>Artificer</strong></em> might be an interesting [for those who like artificers/eberron] twist, and alternate type/example of "magic rogue" for those who aren't interested in being a "trickster."</p><p></p><p>Sorcerer: I've done several iterations of sorcerer subclasses. To reiterate, sorcerer's are broken into the "Ancestry" camp: <em>Dragon, Favored Soul</em> [celestial], possibly <em>Storm</em> [if you use an air elemental or djinn as your back-/origin-story] or "Environmental" camp: <em>Wild Magic, Shadow,</em> possibly Storm [if you're not using an ancestor origin/backstory]. That in mind, they seem much more interested in working the "environmental" angle so that those involving other beings are more focused on warlocks. I could see/and would make sense, to include a<em><strong> Fae </strong></em>origin. An <strong><em>Elemental origin</em></strong>, since like Storm, you could worked that as either "my great grandmama was a X" or "you fell into/slept near/woke up in/whatever a font/vat/portal/whatever of elemental power." Might see a <em>Duskblade.</em> Maybe a <em>Soulknife</em> [especially if they bring Mystic in, they can start intro-ing psychic-base/-flavored subclasses for other classes]. Not that I care for either. But they're a possibility. The sorcerer has a lot of untapped potential.</p><p></p><p>Warlock: <strong><em>Sha'ir </em></strong>[genie based pact]: creates a pact for a genie-servant who grants spells-casting ability other warlocks don't get. <strong><em>"Binder/Diabolist"</em></strong>: a warlock that uses and gains multiple/different pacts -mostly temporary, maybe some permanent- with different entities to get things done/increase their power. Also, multiple [at least two] new pact options and a few invocations. EDIT: Oh! and I forgot. I would like to see, though I don't know what you'd call it, a Celestial Patron warlock [and probably accompanying additional pact and some new invocations]. /Edit. </p><p></p><p>Wizard:<strong><em> Tradition of the Craft </em></strong>[folk/nature magic/traditional Witch], <strong><em>Tradition of the Magi</em></strong> [generalist mage]. A <em>Runecaster</em>subclass [versus the "prestige class" model they've already presented] to dovetail/follow the giant AP makes sense also. <em>Alternately,</em> for Wizards, since they already have so many existing subclasses, they could just present multiple different 5 level "prestige class" traditions to provide an additional "layer" over the existing schools. So, as the runecaster we already have, you'd have a "Generalist/Mage" prestige class that just lets you pick some other schools' special abilities as you advance, maybe gives you a magic enhanced strike with a special staff. A Shadowcaster [like a rune caster but shadowy powers]. Not sure how you'd do a witch this way, but it probably would work. etc... </p><p></p><p>That's mostly my thoughts.</p><p></p><p>I would think, after the subclasses UAs I think we'll see a return to setting-specific material. For example, a special race or subrace, couple of subclasses, couple of backgrounds, maybe a [very] setting specific feat or languages or some kind of flavor material for a giveen campiagn setting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6975244, member: 92511"] Some interesting thoughts in here...some I agree with... Next: I think there's a good chance we'll see "Mystic #3" next. That's where it falls in the alphabetical order. They clearly want to get a psychic class introduced into the game. It would be nice if they put out something in UA that was complete and thorough and, well, tested and vetted for flavor and crunch with a sufficient number of subclasses to give [most] psychic fans what they're looking for all at once. Then, I reeeally wouldn't mind, to be honest, if they SKIPPED Ranger altogether. We have two different "base" rangers. We have, what at this point, a half dozen or so subclass options. They've already done 3 UA's on the Ranger. ENOUGH already! Rogue: I'd love to see how they'd do a committed[I] [B]Acrobat[/B][/I] subclass, but I doubt it would happen. I'm kind of at a loss for other Roguish optinos. [I][B]A "divine 1/3rd caster"[/B][/I] equivalent to the Arcane Trickster would be expected. Whether that's Inquisitor" or Avenger or "Assassin's Creed" in flavor/slant I can not say. An [I][B]Artificer[/B][/I] might be an interesting [for those who like artificers/eberron] twist, and alternate type/example of "magic rogue" for those who aren't interested in being a "trickster." Sorcerer: I've done several iterations of sorcerer subclasses. To reiterate, sorcerer's are broken into the "Ancestry" camp: [I]Dragon, Favored Soul[/I] [celestial], possibly [I]Storm[/I] [if you use an air elemental or djinn as your back-/origin-story] or "Environmental" camp: [I]Wild Magic, Shadow,[/I] possibly Storm [if you're not using an ancestor origin/backstory]. That in mind, they seem much more interested in working the "environmental" angle so that those involving other beings are more focused on warlocks. I could see/and would make sense, to include a[I][B] Fae [/B][/I]origin. An [B][I]Elemental origin[/I][/B], since like Storm, you could worked that as either "my great grandmama was a X" or "you fell into/slept near/woke up in/whatever a font/vat/portal/whatever of elemental power." Might see a [I]Duskblade.[/I] Maybe a [I]Soulknife[/I] [especially if they bring Mystic in, they can start intro-ing psychic-base/-flavored subclasses for other classes]. Not that I care for either. But they're a possibility. The sorcerer has a lot of untapped potential. Warlock: [B][I]Sha'ir [/I][/B][genie based pact]: creates a pact for a genie-servant who grants spells-casting ability other warlocks don't get. [B][I]"Binder/Diabolist"[/I][/B]: a warlock that uses and gains multiple/different pacts -mostly temporary, maybe some permanent- with different entities to get things done/increase their power. Also, multiple [at least two] new pact options and a few invocations. EDIT: Oh! and I forgot. I would like to see, though I don't know what you'd call it, a Celestial Patron warlock [and probably accompanying additional pact and some new invocations]. /Edit. Wizard:[B][I] Tradition of the Craft [/I][/B][folk/nature magic/traditional Witch], [B][I]Tradition of the Magi[/I][/B] [generalist mage]. A [I]Runecaster[/I]subclass [versus the "prestige class" model they've already presented] to dovetail/follow the giant AP makes sense also. [I]Alternately,[/I] for Wizards, since they already have so many existing subclasses, they could just present multiple different 5 level "prestige class" traditions to provide an additional "layer" over the existing schools. So, as the runecaster we already have, you'd have a "Generalist/Mage" prestige class that just lets you pick some other schools' special abilities as you advance, maybe gives you a magic enhanced strike with a special staff. A Shadowcaster [like a rune caster but shadowy powers]. Not sure how you'd do a witch this way, but it probably would work. etc... That's mostly my thoughts. I would think, after the subclasses UAs I think we'll see a return to setting-specific material. For example, a special race or subrace, couple of subclasses, couple of backgrounds, maybe a [very] setting specific feat or languages or some kind of flavor material for a giveen campiagn setting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Speculation on the Remaining UAs in 2017
Top