Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Speed Enchantment and Two Weapon Fighting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BlindKobold" data-source="post: 333131" data-attributes="member: 1375"><p>You do NOT have to take a full-round action to get more than one ATTACK per round. End of story. Anyone who says differently needs to go back and read some rules.</p><p></p><p>Here are but a FEW examples:</p><p></p><p><strong>Haste.</strong> - Haste gives you an extra partial action. You may attack with this partial action or you may dance the funky chicken. This is irregardless of any other previous actions in the round. So you could move your full move (move equivelent)... then attack (standard)... then attack again (extra haste partial).</p><p></p><p><strong>ATTACK of oppurtunity</strong> - This is a special case... but it's STILL an attack. You can make an attack of oppurtunity on a creature who provokes you irregardless of what type of action you took/are taking/will take. With Combat Reflexes, you can make MANY attacks of oppurtunity.</p><p></p><p><strong>Expert Tactician</strong> - When an opponent is denied his dexterity bonus, you make an extra attack on him irregardless of whether you are using a full round action. A common use is for rogues to Bluff (move equivilent), then attack as a sneak attack (bonus attack from expert tactician) and then attack (standard attack).</p><p></p><p><strong>Improved Trip</strong> - If you successfully trip an opponent, you make a free attack on them. In other words... move up to the person (move equivilent), trip attack (standard attack) and then, provided the trip was successful) extra attack (improved trip extra attack).</p><p></p><p><strong>NOTE - Trip is a validate attack option to use during an attack of oppurtunity which if sucecssful, would give 2 attacks (AoO as a trip, then regular attack from Improved Trip) without taking a full round action.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>So what do the above examples prove?! NOTHING! Except that the "no multiple attacks without a full round action" is a worthless argument.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>That said... here's my take.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Speed weapons use the "haste" action, so if you were hasted, you couldn't utilize both at the same time. It's like trying to combine two bonuses of the same type (armor bonuses don't stack, enhancement bonuses don't stack, etc.).</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>HOWEVER, I would allow both weapons of speed to use the SAME haste action and go off simultaneously, thus invoking all the penalties associated with two-weapon fighting.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Why? For one reason.... if someone dumps two feats into Two-weapon fighting and Ambidexterity, there has to be SOME pay-off.... even if it doesn't come until you can afford to buy (or have someone make) Speed weapons... which shouldn't be until at least level 12... when the wizard is teleporting all over the place and disintegrating things. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I would NOT allow a munckin player to try to claim that they go off differently and therefore you can effectively fighting with two weapons without the feats. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>But hey... that's just my opinion.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BlindKobold, post: 333131, member: 1375"] You do NOT have to take a full-round action to get more than one ATTACK per round. End of story. Anyone who says differently needs to go back and read some rules. Here are but a FEW examples: [b]Haste.[/b] - Haste gives you an extra partial action. You may attack with this partial action or you may dance the funky chicken. This is irregardless of any other previous actions in the round. So you could move your full move (move equivelent)... then attack (standard)... then attack again (extra haste partial). [b]ATTACK of oppurtunity[/b] - This is a special case... but it's STILL an attack. You can make an attack of oppurtunity on a creature who provokes you irregardless of what type of action you took/are taking/will take. With Combat Reflexes, you can make MANY attacks of oppurtunity. [b]Expert Tactician[/b] - When an opponent is denied his dexterity bonus, you make an extra attack on him irregardless of whether you are using a full round action. A common use is for rogues to Bluff (move equivilent), then attack as a sneak attack (bonus attack from expert tactician) and then attack (standard attack). [b]Improved Trip[/b] - If you successfully trip an opponent, you make a free attack on them. In other words... move up to the person (move equivilent), trip attack (standard attack) and then, provided the trip was successful) extra attack (improved trip extra attack). [b]NOTE - Trip is a validate attack option to use during an attack of oppurtunity which if sucecssful, would give 2 attacks (AoO as a trip, then regular attack from Improved Trip) without taking a full round action. So what do the above examples prove?! NOTHING! Except that the "no multiple attacks without a full round action" is a worthless argument. That said... here's my take. Speed weapons use the "haste" action, so if you were hasted, you couldn't utilize both at the same time. It's like trying to combine two bonuses of the same type (armor bonuses don't stack, enhancement bonuses don't stack, etc.). HOWEVER, I would allow both weapons of speed to use the SAME haste action and go off simultaneously, thus invoking all the penalties associated with two-weapon fighting. Why? For one reason.... if someone dumps two feats into Two-weapon fighting and Ambidexterity, there has to be SOME pay-off.... even if it doesn't come until you can afford to buy (or have someone make) Speed weapons... which shouldn't be until at least level 12... when the wizard is teleporting all over the place and disintegrating things. I would NOT allow a munckin player to try to claim that they go off differently and therefore you can effectively fighting with two weapons without the feats. But hey... that's just my opinion.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Speed Enchantment and Two Weapon Fighting
Top