Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Speed of Light question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fuindordm" data-source="post: 2683791" data-attributes="member: 5435"><p>Note that the bending of light by gravity is also predicted by Newtonian gravitational theory. Einstein's prediction was that the degree of deflection would be exactly double the about predicted by Newton, and he was right! This was a pretty difficult measurement to make at the time, but a lot of his contemporaries thought his theory was unnecessarily complicated.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A phenomenon used extensively today to verify the existence of dark matter and map its distribution in the universe. Here's a dramatic example, where the images of very distant galaxies are stretched out into long arcs by the gravity of the galaxy cluster in the foreground.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap011007.html" target="_blank">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap011007.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This site is written by a crank. Their writing style is very distinctive. Lots of people are interested in the answers to the grand questions, and borrow the trappings of physics and mathematics without bothering to learn enough of the subject to be able to analyze their own ideas with any rigor. Instead, they assert the truth of their statements as self-evident or mystical revelation, and throw in a bit of math to make it seem as if they have done the work.</p><p></p><p>When I started my first postdoc, I received an unsolicited paper from a crank who had a new theory on the origins of the universe, something about a fundamental wave spawning other waves of ever-increasing complexity. None of it was comprehensible, but the paper attracted my attention because of the last line of his abstract:</p><p></p><p>"...and in addition, we rationalize pi."</p><p></p><p>Intrigued, I turned to the appendix. He started off by taking pi=22/7, wrote out the decimal version to something like twenty places, then did some arithmetic to prove that the result was a rational number.</p><p></p><p>It was good for a laugh, at least. </p><p></p><p>Ben</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fuindordm, post: 2683791, member: 5435"] Note that the bending of light by gravity is also predicted by Newtonian gravitational theory. Einstein's prediction was that the degree of deflection would be exactly double the about predicted by Newton, and he was right! This was a pretty difficult measurement to make at the time, but a lot of his contemporaries thought his theory was unnecessarily complicated. A phenomenon used extensively today to verify the existence of dark matter and map its distribution in the universe. Here's a dramatic example, where the images of very distant galaxies are stretched out into long arcs by the gravity of the galaxy cluster in the foreground. [url]http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap011007.html[/url] This site is written by a crank. Their writing style is very distinctive. Lots of people are interested in the answers to the grand questions, and borrow the trappings of physics and mathematics without bothering to learn enough of the subject to be able to analyze their own ideas with any rigor. Instead, they assert the truth of their statements as self-evident or mystical revelation, and throw in a bit of math to make it seem as if they have done the work. When I started my first postdoc, I received an unsolicited paper from a crank who had a new theory on the origins of the universe, something about a fundamental wave spawning other waves of ever-increasing complexity. None of it was comprehensible, but the paper attracted my attention because of the last line of his abstract: "...and in addition, we rationalize pi." Intrigued, I turned to the appendix. He started off by taking pi=22/7, wrote out the decimal version to something like twenty places, then did some arithmetic to prove that the result was a rational number. It was good for a laugh, at least. Ben [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Speed of Light question
Top