Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Speed of Light question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 2703108" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Well, that depends. There isn't just one "dark matter theory".</p><p></p><p>In the most basic sense "dark matter" is merely that matter which is not glowing brightly enough for us to see it with our devices at interstellar distances. By this definition, the Earth itself is "dark matter". The question is simply if there's enough of it or not.</p><p></p><p>Some attempts have been made to posit some exotic materials among the mundane dark matter, to effectively up the overall mass out there. None of those have stuck particularly well.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It isn't really "no clue". You can get estimates on masses based upon how objects move. While dark, the holes exert gravitational effects on bodies that aren't dark. Which isnt' to say that we're 100% certain, but extremes can be eliminated.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, what does it matter that the data is old? </p><p></p><p>If I assume the past works as the present, and I look at that old data, and that data is consident with my current rules, then I can take that as evidence that my current model also held at previous times.</p><p></p><p>If I assume the past works like the present, and I look at the old data, and that data is not consistent with my current rules, I can take that as evidence that the rules have changed, and I can start looking at how the rules have changed. </p><p></p><p>Either way, science wins. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Plus, understanding is not only about the here and now:</p><p></p><p>Consider, for a moment, that you knew nothing at all about cats. Never seen one, never heard of one. And I put you in a room with a 5 year old cat. You could watch it's behavior and learn a few things about it, but some things would remain a mystery. The whole thing about jumpiong in your lap, purring, kneading, and wanting to be stroked would be a bit baffling.</p><p></p><p>If, however, you look back in that cat's life, back to when it was a kitten, and at how it interacted with it's mother, you'd see where the purring and kneading and stroking come from, and in that context they make much more sense.</p><p></p><p>Which just goes to show that you need to know about the past in order to fully grok the present. So not only is the age of that data not a barrier to better understanding. It's rather a requirement. If all we saw was how the universe was today, at this instant, we would be able to say much less about how it functions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 2703108, member: 177"] Well, that depends. There isn't just one "dark matter theory". In the most basic sense "dark matter" is merely that matter which is not glowing brightly enough for us to see it with our devices at interstellar distances. By this definition, the Earth itself is "dark matter". The question is simply if there's enough of it or not. Some attempts have been made to posit some exotic materials among the mundane dark matter, to effectively up the overall mass out there. None of those have stuck particularly well. It isn't really "no clue". You can get estimates on masses based upon how objects move. While dark, the holes exert gravitational effects on bodies that aren't dark. Which isnt' to say that we're 100% certain, but extremes can be eliminated. Well, what does it matter that the data is old? If I assume the past works as the present, and I look at that old data, and that data is consident with my current rules, then I can take that as evidence that my current model also held at previous times. If I assume the past works like the present, and I look at the old data, and that data is not consistent with my current rules, I can take that as evidence that the rules have changed, and I can start looking at how the rules have changed. Either way, science wins. :) Plus, understanding is not only about the here and now: Consider, for a moment, that you knew nothing at all about cats. Never seen one, never heard of one. And I put you in a room with a 5 year old cat. You could watch it's behavior and learn a few things about it, but some things would remain a mystery. The whole thing about jumpiong in your lap, purring, kneading, and wanting to be stroked would be a bit baffling. If, however, you look back in that cat's life, back to when it was a kitten, and at how it interacted with it's mother, you'd see where the purring and kneading and stroking come from, and in that context they make much more sense. Which just goes to show that you need to know about the past in order to fully grok the present. So not only is the age of that data not a barrier to better understanding. It's rather a requirement. If all we saw was how the universe was today, at this instant, we would be able to say much less about how it functions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Speed of Light question
Top