Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jefgorbach" data-source="post: 5758822" data-attributes="member: 28278">AFB so unsure if this is IMC or RAW but....1. -ALL- forms of magic are simply alt/n methods of applying a given spell, so while someone could attempt a spellcraft check to recognize if/what spell had been employed ... the real question is whether they would question whether such a wall might/might not exist in THAT particular location to begin with as its highly unlikely he'd routinely question/spellcheck &quot;everything&quot;. 2. yes. IRC a successful save vs illusion confirms it is merely an illusion so a successful spellcheck should/would do the same thing. 3. correct ... rings, scrolls, wands and the like are enchanted at a preset level thereby the values for the various level-dependent variables. 4. yes, the party would gain the corresponding coverage from the giant's pov.5. yes, because the giant believes he' being attack on multiple fronts and diverting/investing his attention accordingly. 6. not really. the giant is already &quot;aware&quot; of the illusonary foe and expects its eventual attack. Conversely, the swapped creature would gain an attack vs the flat-footed giant if it truly the victim believed the illusion was/remained a simple illusion and thus could/should not be able to actually attack.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jefgorbach, post: 5758822, member: 28278"] AFB so unsure if this is IMC or RAW but.... 1. -ALL- forms of magic are simply alt/n methods of applying a given spell, so while someone could attempt a spellcraft check to recognize if/what spell had been employed ... the real question is whether they would question whether such a wall might/might not exist in THAT particular location to begin with as its highly unlikely he'd routinely question/spellcheck "everything". 2. yes. IRC a successful save vs illusion confirms it is merely an illusion so a successful spellcheck should/would do the same thing. 3. correct ... rings, scrolls, wands and the like are enchanted at a preset level thereby the values for the various level-dependent variables. 4. yes, the party would gain the corresponding coverage from the giant's pov. 5. yes, because the giant believes he' being attack on multiple fronts and diverting/investing his attention accordingly. 6. not really. the giant is already "aware" of the illusonary foe and expects its eventual attack. Conversely, the swapped creature would gain an attack vs the flat-footed giant if it truly the victim believed the illusion was/remained a simple illusion and thus could/should not be able to actually attack. [/QUOTE]

Verification