Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell Creation vs Metamagic Feats?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="da_deadman" data-source="post: 1054063" data-attributes="member: 9946"><p>There are 2 clear examples of spells in the PHB that are 3rd level wizard spells that have had the metamagic feat applied to them.</p><p></p><p>Chain Lightning which is Lightning with the chain spell metamagic feat.</p><p></p><p>Delayed Fireball Blast which is Fireball with the delay spell metamagic feat.</p><p></p><p>Both of these spells are cast as spells of thier respective levels, this means that they have spell DC and damage dice of their actual spell level.</p><p></p><p>VS a Lightning spell with the chain spell metamagic feat cost a 6th level slot, but has a 3rd level DC and damage. Same for the Fireball spell with a delayed spell metamagic feat; cost an 8th level slot, but has 3rd level DC and damage.</p><p></p><p>Now, taking this into account. Why would anybody use a metamagic feat to accomplish chain lightning or delayed fireball blast? The sole reason (that I can think of) is that they do not "have" the spell in their spellbook yet!</p><p></p><p>Also, with the ability to create your own spells as per the PHB and DMG, why couldn't a spellcaster just create a spell that would do the same things as these two spells do and make them a regular spell?</p><p></p><p>I can think of many reasons TO do this, Clerics that only have 3 spells that need to be persisted (Divine Favor/Power and Righteous Might), SORCS that have to use full round to cast any metamagic spell (but they don't have to use a full round to cast one of these two do they?), To have a cool spell in your spellbook (Yes divine casters can also have a spellbook).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On the side of metamagic feats.</p><p></p><p>No need to create a new spell for each application of a metamagic feat.</p><p></p><p>Can use them on new spells that they learn as soon as they learn them.</p><p></p><p>In rare cases can make use of improved metamagic to get the same effects for lower spell slots (although they will also have the lower DC and damage of the base spell).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Having both sides of the argument presented, would it be fair to let spells be created that would mimic other metamagic feats, without the need to have the feat or use the feat?</p><p></p><p>Could someone point out a more concrete method of spell creation for the NON-EPIC spellcaster.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This woudl make SORCS a lot better overall as would let them cast metamagic (like) spells without the need for full round casting, but would it make them TOO powerfull?</p><p></p><p>Also a cleric that made Divine Favor, Divine Power and Righteous Might into 24 hour spells at 4 levels higher per spell would save 2 feats, but would this necessarily make them TOO Powerfull?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="da_deadman, post: 1054063, member: 9946"] There are 2 clear examples of spells in the PHB that are 3rd level wizard spells that have had the metamagic feat applied to them. Chain Lightning which is Lightning with the chain spell metamagic feat. Delayed Fireball Blast which is Fireball with the delay spell metamagic feat. Both of these spells are cast as spells of thier respective levels, this means that they have spell DC and damage dice of their actual spell level. VS a Lightning spell with the chain spell metamagic feat cost a 6th level slot, but has a 3rd level DC and damage. Same for the Fireball spell with a delayed spell metamagic feat; cost an 8th level slot, but has 3rd level DC and damage. Now, taking this into account. Why would anybody use a metamagic feat to accomplish chain lightning or delayed fireball blast? The sole reason (that I can think of) is that they do not "have" the spell in their spellbook yet! Also, with the ability to create your own spells as per the PHB and DMG, why couldn't a spellcaster just create a spell that would do the same things as these two spells do and make them a regular spell? I can think of many reasons TO do this, Clerics that only have 3 spells that need to be persisted (Divine Favor/Power and Righteous Might), SORCS that have to use full round to cast any metamagic spell (but they don't have to use a full round to cast one of these two do they?), To have a cool spell in your spellbook (Yes divine casters can also have a spellbook). On the side of metamagic feats. No need to create a new spell for each application of a metamagic feat. Can use them on new spells that they learn as soon as they learn them. In rare cases can make use of improved metamagic to get the same effects for lower spell slots (although they will also have the lower DC and damage of the base spell). Having both sides of the argument presented, would it be fair to let spells be created that would mimic other metamagic feats, without the need to have the feat or use the feat? Could someone point out a more concrete method of spell creation for the NON-EPIC spellcaster. This woudl make SORCS a lot better overall as would let them cast metamagic (like) spells without the need for full round casting, but would it make them TOO powerfull? Also a cleric that made Divine Favor, Divine Power and Righteous Might into 24 hour spells at 4 levels higher per spell would save 2 feats, but would this necessarily make them TOO Powerfull? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell Creation vs Metamagic Feats?
Top