Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell DCs House Rule: Applying the "reserve feat" principle.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Runestar" data-source="post: 4358691" data-attributes="member: 72317"><p>You just need to hold one of your highest lv spells back in reserve. Which depending on whether you went focused specialist or not, may or may not be such a big deal. I concede there is a difference, but I feel that it is less significant than you believe it to be.</p><p></p><p>Not quite what I meant. My point was that their efficacy is improved when you cast them in addition to the higher lv spells you are normally casting. You don't cast them in place of your higher lv spells - you cast them in addition to your higher lv spells.</p><p></p><p>Lets say my wizard is able to quicken spells (chronocharm, rod of quicken, master specialist conjurer10 etc). Now imagine that I am casting a quickened lower lv spell (~lv1-3) in addition to the higher lv spell each round. Normally, the lower lv spell won't be expected to have much of an impact unless you specially chose spells which do not have saves (such as damage spells like magic missile or scorching ray). You wouldn't bother with spells like grease or glitterdust because their low dcs means they will rarely get through, however useful an effect they may produce on a failed save).</p><p></p><p>Now with your proposed houserule, I can quicken those spells I had previously shunned and still have the desired results, because their heightened dcs means that I will now have a much higher success rate.</p><p></p><p>Because the effectivenss of those lower lv spells improve, so too does your efficacy. Likewise, while the lower DCs of said spells may have discouraged you from casting them in the first place, you will face no such reservations now. Your improved effectiveness comes from casting these extra spells you otherwise would not have cast to begin with, slots which may well have gone to waste at the end of the day unless you fill them all with utility spells and get the chance to use them (like rope trick or fly).</p><p></p><p>I think the impact of your houserule is only more significant at higher lvs, where the disparity between your highest and lowest lv spells becomes all the more apparent. </p><p></p><p>I am not making myself any clearer, am I?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Runestar, post: 4358691, member: 72317"] You just need to hold one of your highest lv spells back in reserve. Which depending on whether you went focused specialist or not, may or may not be such a big deal. I concede there is a difference, but I feel that it is less significant than you believe it to be. Not quite what I meant. My point was that their efficacy is improved when you cast them in addition to the higher lv spells you are normally casting. You don't cast them in place of your higher lv spells - you cast them in addition to your higher lv spells. Lets say my wizard is able to quicken spells (chronocharm, rod of quicken, master specialist conjurer10 etc). Now imagine that I am casting a quickened lower lv spell (~lv1-3) in addition to the higher lv spell each round. Normally, the lower lv spell won't be expected to have much of an impact unless you specially chose spells which do not have saves (such as damage spells like magic missile or scorching ray). You wouldn't bother with spells like grease or glitterdust because their low dcs means they will rarely get through, however useful an effect they may produce on a failed save). Now with your proposed houserule, I can quicken those spells I had previously shunned and still have the desired results, because their heightened dcs means that I will now have a much higher success rate. Because the effectivenss of those lower lv spells improve, so too does your efficacy. Likewise, while the lower DCs of said spells may have discouraged you from casting them in the first place, you will face no such reservations now. Your improved effectiveness comes from casting these extra spells you otherwise would not have cast to begin with, slots which may well have gone to waste at the end of the day unless you fill them all with utility spells and get the chance to use them (like rope trick or fly). I think the impact of your houserule is only more significant at higher lvs, where the disparity between your highest and lowest lv spells becomes all the more apparent. I am not making myself any clearer, am I?:p [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell DCs House Rule: Applying the "reserve feat" principle.
Top