Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Spell Focus 3.5: WAH! Was it that bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PaulGreystoke" data-source="post: 1035741" data-attributes="member: 10810"><p><strong>Why all the Fuss?</strong></p><p></p><p>I'm surprised people are still complaining about the Spell Focus nerf. I know it seemed startling a few weeks ago when we first heard about it, but it scarcely seems to be an issue now that the books are out. Those who have roved through the 3.5 spell lists have discovered that there has been a dramatic increase in the number of no save spells. The 3.5 paradigm is that if a spell requires a touch attack roll, then it allows no save. There are now spells (new & old alike) of almost every level that fit this new paradigm, so spellcasters don't need to buff up their spell DCs in order to affect creatures with good saves. They just need to succeed at a touch attack roll, which remains absurdly easy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>The same is true of those complaining that SR wasn't nerfed. The fact the most Conjuration spells can't be resisted by SR renders the point moot. A good spellcaster will just make sure that they have some Conjurations available when they are likely to face opponents with SR. Only Specialists who have taken Conjuration as one of their opposed schools won't be able to benefit from this change. Of course, since Teleportation is now part of the Conjuration school, I doubt we will see many of these theoretical Conjuration-bereft Specialists in actual play. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PaulGreystoke, post: 1035741, member: 10810"] [b]Why all the Fuss?[/b] I'm surprised people are still complaining about the Spell Focus nerf. I know it seemed startling a few weeks ago when we first heard about it, but it scarcely seems to be an issue now that the books are out. Those who have roved through the 3.5 spell lists have discovered that there has been a dramatic increase in the number of no save spells. The 3.5 paradigm is that if a spell requires a touch attack roll, then it allows no save. There are now spells (new & old alike) of almost every level that fit this new paradigm, so spellcasters don't need to buff up their spell DCs in order to affect creatures with good saves. They just need to succeed at a touch attack roll, which remains absurdly easy. :p The same is true of those complaining that SR wasn't nerfed. The fact the most Conjuration spells can't be resisted by SR renders the point moot. A good spellcaster will just make sure that they have some Conjurations available when they are likely to face opponents with SR. Only Specialists who have taken Conjuration as one of their opposed schools won't be able to benefit from this change. Of course, since Teleportation is now part of the Conjuration school, I doubt we will see many of these theoretical Conjuration-bereft Specialists in actual play. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Spell Focus 3.5: WAH! Was it that bad?
Top