Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
spell focus requires 13 Cha?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 4290694" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Ok - I didn't have my book in front of me and didn't realize it specifically said wizard powers. That actually makes it much worse, since they are going even further down the "only one class needs this and it is outside their core functions entirely" path. I'm pretty sure the wizard description doesn't mention anything about Cha being important. In fact, unless you were carefully pondering all of your feat choices when you were creating the character, you would probably never stat yourself to be able to take this feat - and since you can't change your stats, you're pretty much boned, unless you spend your incredibly precious attribute bonuses on a stat that does nothing but give you this feat. (Even the example wizards I've seen aren't stated to take this feat!)</p><p></p><p>And I'm just not buying the "for balance" argument. The feat is balanced by making it a higher tier - that makes sense. Forcing a wizard to blow precious stat points on something completely outside their forte - that makes no sense.</p><p></p><p>And yes: there are always house rules. I think "Wis 15" or even "Int 19" - or even 21 - is a much better requirement than Cha 13.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 4290694, member: 9789"] Ok - I didn't have my book in front of me and didn't realize it specifically said wizard powers. That actually makes it much worse, since they are going even further down the "only one class needs this and it is outside their core functions entirely" path. I'm pretty sure the wizard description doesn't mention anything about Cha being important. In fact, unless you were carefully pondering all of your feat choices when you were creating the character, you would probably never stat yourself to be able to take this feat - and since you can't change your stats, you're pretty much boned, unless you spend your incredibly precious attribute bonuses on a stat that does nothing but give you this feat. (Even the example wizards I've seen aren't stated to take this feat!) And I'm just not buying the "for balance" argument. The feat is balanced by making it a higher tier - that makes sense. Forcing a wizard to blow precious stat points on something completely outside their forte - that makes no sense. And yes: there are always house rules. I think "Wis 15" or even "Int 19" - or even 21 - is a much better requirement than Cha 13. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
spell focus requires 13 Cha?
Top