Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell List vs Ritual List
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaer" data-source="post: 3983653" data-attributes="member: 57861"><p>And here I was thinking players would be able to pick their at will/per encounter/per day spells, such as: at 5th lvl, you have 1 per day spell picked from the 3rd lvl spell list. At 6th lvl, 2 per day spells from the 3rd lvl spell list. At 7th lvl, 1 per encounter spell from the 3rd lvl list, 1 per day from the 3rd lvl list and 1 per day from the 4th lvl spell list and so on. In this way a wizard could have fireball and phantom steed per day. He doesn't need phantom steed that often, so he keeps it as a per day ability, while he makes fireball his per encoounter when he is powerful enough, but it is his choice, not inherent in the spell how often he gets it per day.</p><p></p><p>Just my assumption on how things might work with spells advancing from per day to per encounter to at will as the character levels up. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If Open Locks and Disable Disvices is being wrapped up in one skill, the rogue still has reason to load up this skill because it does more than open locks. Also, at low levels, the wizard might not have the resources to open locks at all, so it makes sense the rogue will want the skill. If the wizard has to decide between taking knock or taking something else and the rogue is competent as a lock picker, there is really no reason the wizard would pick knock as a spell instead of something else more useful to the group (being that knock, in this group, is not useful because someone else can do the same effect).</p><p></p><p>Knock only steps on a rogues toes when it comes in wand form, and as such is not consuming the wizard's resources. At that point, the rogue never needs worry about unlocking anything again; anyone with the wand can get through anything.</p><p></p><p>I'd rather see knock either auto-succeed a certain static Open Lock DC check (a 5th lvl caster automatically gets an Open Lock roll of 20 as though he "took ten" on the roll) or it allowed the wizard to make a check versus the DC of the lock (Knock gives a +2/caster lvl + int mod Open Lock roll vs the lock's DC or something like that). While emulating a rogue with the Open Locks skill, it eats the wizard's spell resources to do so and doesn't make him better than the rogue - he still needs to make a check. And the rogue might have ways to modify the roll (special picks, feats, what-have-you) while the wizard would not.</p><p></p><p>Magic's knack for auto-success (particulary in low level spells like Knock and Invisibility) has always annoyed me. I hope they reduce that quality.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaer, post: 3983653, member: 57861"] And here I was thinking players would be able to pick their at will/per encounter/per day spells, such as: at 5th lvl, you have 1 per day spell picked from the 3rd lvl spell list. At 6th lvl, 2 per day spells from the 3rd lvl spell list. At 7th lvl, 1 per encounter spell from the 3rd lvl list, 1 per day from the 3rd lvl list and 1 per day from the 4th lvl spell list and so on. In this way a wizard could have fireball and phantom steed per day. He doesn't need phantom steed that often, so he keeps it as a per day ability, while he makes fireball his per encoounter when he is powerful enough, but it is his choice, not inherent in the spell how often he gets it per day. Just my assumption on how things might work with spells advancing from per day to per encounter to at will as the character levels up. If Open Locks and Disable Disvices is being wrapped up in one skill, the rogue still has reason to load up this skill because it does more than open locks. Also, at low levels, the wizard might not have the resources to open locks at all, so it makes sense the rogue will want the skill. If the wizard has to decide between taking knock or taking something else and the rogue is competent as a lock picker, there is really no reason the wizard would pick knock as a spell instead of something else more useful to the group (being that knock, in this group, is not useful because someone else can do the same effect). Knock only steps on a rogues toes when it comes in wand form, and as such is not consuming the wizard's resources. At that point, the rogue never needs worry about unlocking anything again; anyone with the wand can get through anything. I'd rather see knock either auto-succeed a certain static Open Lock DC check (a 5th lvl caster automatically gets an Open Lock roll of 20 as though he "took ten" on the roll) or it allowed the wizard to make a check versus the DC of the lock (Knock gives a +2/caster lvl + int mod Open Lock roll vs the lock's DC or something like that). While emulating a rogue with the Open Locks skill, it eats the wizard's spell resources to do so and doesn't make him better than the rogue - he still needs to make a check. And the rogue might have ways to modify the roll (special picks, feats, what-have-you) while the wizard would not. Magic's knack for auto-success (particulary in low level spells like Knock and Invisibility) has always annoyed me. I hope they reduce that quality. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell List vs Ritual List
Top