Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell Mastery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wuyanei" data-source="post: 2731104" data-attributes="member: 28913"><p>Its not really a problem of 'needing' the DM to screw the wizard. Most parties <strong>will</strong> be captured or otherwise stripped of their gear, at least once in their career. For a wizard without some backup spell-book, that simply spells doom. For a wizard with a tattooed spell or two, or a wizard with Spell Mastery, the spells may be enough to tide his over until the party recovers or captures another spell book.</p><p></p><p>The problem with the Spell Mastery feat as written is that it does not scale -- spells that are useful at low levels are quickly overshadowed at higher levels.</p><p></p><p>For example, it would be wise for a 7th level wizard to keep a second copy of the <em>dimension door</em> spell on him, in order to escape if ever captured. However, at 9th level the <em>teleport</em> spell will take over this role, and then by <em>greater teleport</em> or even <em>gate</em> (just use the spell twice). If you took Spell Mastery for the <em>dimension door</em> spell, it becomes a sub-optimal choice within two levels, and mostly worthless in four levels time.</p><p></p><p>The same thing happens with most other useful spells: <em>dispel magic</em> gives way to <em>greater dispel</em> then to <em>reaving dispel</em>; <em>alter self</em> advances to <em>polymorph</em> and then to <em>shapechange</em>; so on and so on. The way D&D magic is designed, a spell's effectiveness is capped, and then its role taken over by a higher level spell. So with Spell Mastery, you are swiftly stuck with a list of mastered spells that you will never use.</p><p></p><p>Your change is good, IMO, because it begins to address the scalability issue -- one spell per class level ensures that the wizard will always have a useful spell among his spells mastered.</p><p></p><p>So, with that in mind, here's another way to make the feat scalable. Treat the 'spells mastered' more like slots to be filled. The wizard gains 3 + Int mod 'slots', which he can fill with 'mastered' spells i.e. spells learned by heart. He may spend 1 day per spell level of the new spell to memorize a new spell, but he forgets one old 'mastered' spell if he does so. Basically, the wizard's mind becomes like 3+ Int mod pages from a baccob's blessed book, except that the 'mind-pages' can be erased and rewritten.</p><p></p><p>[code][FONT=Times New Roman]SPELL MASTERY [SPECIAL]</p><p>[b]Prerequisite:[/b] Wizard level 1st</p><p>[b]Benefit:[/b] Each time you take this feat, choose a number of spells</p><p>equal to three plus your Intelligence modifier (minimum one spell) that </p><p>you already know. From that point on, you can prepare these spells</p><p>without referring to a spellbook.</p><p> You can swap a previously mastered spell out in order to master new</p><p>spells. In order to do so, you must spend 1 day per spell level of the new</p><p>spell to be mastered studying your spellbook, attempting to commit the</p><p>complex formulas, chaunts, gestures and/or rituals to memory.</p><p> You spend 8 hours each day studying. If your study is interrupted,</p><p>you must spend one extra hour that day for every 30 minutes of the</p><p>interruption. If you are interrupted for more than 2 hours in one day,</p><p>your attempt to master the new spell fails, but you can always try again.</p><p> If you are not too severely interrupted, you may make an Intelligence</p><p>check (DC 15 + the spell level of the new spell) at the end of the duration</p><p>of study. If you succeed, you lose mastery of one previously mastered</p><p>spell (chosen by you) and gain mastery of the new spell.</p><p>[b]Normal:[/b] Without this feat, you must use a spellbook to prepare</p><p>all your spells, except read magic.[/FONT][/code]</p><p></p><p>I think if I were a wizard, I would still rather just tattoo a backup spell or two on my own body (on the soles of my feet, perhaps). You do not actually <strong>need</strong> so many backup spells -- just enough spells to get you back home (where, persumably, you have stored an extra spell-book or three). Still, the above version does make the Spell Mastery feat less useless, so I might try floating it next session.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wuyanei, post: 2731104, member: 28913"] Its not really a problem of 'needing' the DM to screw the wizard. Most parties [b]will[/b] be captured or otherwise stripped of their gear, at least once in their career. For a wizard without some backup spell-book, that simply spells doom. For a wizard with a tattooed spell or two, or a wizard with Spell Mastery, the spells may be enough to tide his over until the party recovers or captures another spell book. The problem with the Spell Mastery feat as written is that it does not scale -- spells that are useful at low levels are quickly overshadowed at higher levels. For example, it would be wise for a 7th level wizard to keep a second copy of the [i]dimension door[/i] spell on him, in order to escape if ever captured. However, at 9th level the [i]teleport[/i] spell will take over this role, and then by [i]greater teleport[/i] or even [i]gate[/i] (just use the spell twice). If you took Spell Mastery for the [i]dimension door[/i] spell, it becomes a sub-optimal choice within two levels, and mostly worthless in four levels time. The same thing happens with most other useful spells: [i]dispel magic[/i] gives way to [i]greater dispel[/i] then to [i]reaving dispel[/i]; [i]alter self[/i] advances to [i]polymorph[/i] and then to [i]shapechange[/i]; so on and so on. The way D&D magic is designed, a spell's effectiveness is capped, and then its role taken over by a higher level spell. So with Spell Mastery, you are swiftly stuck with a list of mastered spells that you will never use. Your change is good, IMO, because it begins to address the scalability issue -- one spell per class level ensures that the wizard will always have a useful spell among his spells mastered. So, with that in mind, here's another way to make the feat scalable. Treat the 'spells mastered' more like slots to be filled. The wizard gains 3 + Int mod 'slots', which he can fill with 'mastered' spells i.e. spells learned by heart. He may spend 1 day per spell level of the new spell to memorize a new spell, but he forgets one old 'mastered' spell if he does so. Basically, the wizard's mind becomes like 3+ Int mod pages from a baccob's blessed book, except that the 'mind-pages' can be erased and rewritten. [code][FONT=Times New Roman]SPELL MASTERY [SPECIAL] [b]Prerequisite:[/b] Wizard level 1st [b]Benefit:[/b] Each time you take this feat, choose a number of spells equal to three plus your Intelligence modifier (minimum one spell) that you already know. From that point on, you can prepare these spells without referring to a spellbook. You can swap a previously mastered spell out in order to master new spells. In order to do so, you must spend 1 day per spell level of the new spell to be mastered studying your spellbook, attempting to commit the complex formulas, chaunts, gestures and/or rituals to memory. You spend 8 hours each day studying. If your study is interrupted, you must spend one extra hour that day for every 30 minutes of the interruption. If you are interrupted for more than 2 hours in one day, your attempt to master the new spell fails, but you can always try again. If you are not too severely interrupted, you may make an Intelligence check (DC 15 + the spell level of the new spell) at the end of the duration of study. If you succeed, you lose mastery of one previously mastered spell (chosen by you) and gain mastery of the new spell. [b]Normal:[/b] Without this feat, you must use a spellbook to prepare all your spells, except read magic.[/FONT][/code] I think if I were a wizard, I would still rather just tattoo a backup spell or two on my own body (on the soles of my feet, perhaps). You do not actually [b]need[/b] so many backup spells -- just enough spells to get you back home (where, persumably, you have stored an extra spell-book or three). Still, the above version does make the Spell Mastery feat less useless, so I might try floating it next session. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spell Mastery
Top