Balance and more balance. Did you actually want a reason or were you hoping to find people who dislike this?Joker said:Besides balance, what is the rationale for having spells cast from items of spell storing cast at the minimum caster level?
Think of it similarly to a scroll (or wand, etc.). A spell stored in a scroll (or wand, etc.) is always at the minimum level (regardless of what level the caster actually was when he cast it into it) unless the caster takes special pains otherwise. This is the same for just about everything, and is and underlying precedent for D&D.Joker said:I would like a reason. I don't dislike it at all. But I have this idea in my head that the spell is cast at a certain caster level by someone and is stored that way aswel.
I'm just looking for a good rationale.
While that is a possible (literal) interpretation, it's been discussed before and it does not seem to be the writer's intent.kjenks said:Unlike a Ring of Spell Storing, a Spell Storing weapon does not cast its spell at minimum caster level. Spell Storing weapons are listed as having "CL 12th" in the ability description (DMG 225), and in the rules governing caster level for weapons (DMG 221) and in the rules describing the "stat block" for magic items (DMG 215).
Legildur said:The more interesting question is not what the caster level is, but what is the difficulty class of the saving throw (if required)?
mvincent said:While that is a possible (literal) interpretation, it's been discussed before and it does not seem to be the writer's intent.