Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 3177980" data-attributes="member: 1656">Strictly, the spell that has you as a target is reflected back at the caster.  The spell that has you as a target is Magic Missile, and includes all five missiles.If the caster also has Spell Turning, there's a chance that both of you will take the full effect of the spell - so you may get hit by all five missiles (along with the caster), even though four were initially aimed at Greg.  Greg is safe.Each of you have a spell that has you as a target.  Strictly, I think each of you should lose a level of turning, and all five missiles are reflected back at the caster.  Should he have spell turning active as well, though, it gets very odd; consequently, I'd be inclined as a DM to determine one person randomly to have their Spell Turning intercept the Magic Missile 'first' and turn all five missiles, so only a single person loses a level of turning, and only that person might be involved in a resonance effect.Same issues as 2, only more so.Strictly, all of you should bear 2/9 of the spell, and the caster should bear 7/9 of the spell, and you all lose all 7 levels of Spell Turning.In practice, I suspect I'd make two random determinations; one person to bear 7/9 of the turning, and a second to bear the other 2/9, thus protecting all five from the spell entirely.  In this case, rather than subjecting the caster to a single full-power Weird, I'd subject him to the two fractional returns separately, because the resonance effects should be determined separately if the caster has Turning active.-Hyp.</blockquote>

Verification