Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shard O'Glase" data-source="post: 140078" data-attributes="member: 1134">How is saying the determiner for a balance in a feat shouldn't be if it unbalances a game, but by comparring it to other feats illogical.  This isn't a point system where I can come up with some nice system to say gee everyone spellfire is worth 100 points every other feat is worth 50 points or less see its unbalanced.  No, sorry you just have to look at the other feats and compare it.So jasamcarl let me make this as simple as possible. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes    :rolleyes:"  data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> I don't care about cinematic flashiness, all I care about is what one single feat delivers in abilities, and if that is more than any other feat delivers in abilities.  Now I could go down the list of every feat, and show what they did, and then post the entire description of what spell fire does as well.  And do some nice comparison and contrast post.  But, I really don't think that is necesarry.  Think about this spellfire basically can counterspell any spell directed at you for free it doesn't cost them a spell, that in it self could be see as worth more than one feat.  Heck mages have to spend a feat just so they can counter spell spells by using a spell from the same school that it and at least one level higher.  Then a spell fire wielder can actually use that spell energy, for not one, but two things.  Either offensive ranged attacks of decent damage, or decent healing.</blockquote>

Verification