Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Spelljammer...just wow
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 3523946" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>I've been pinged... let me gather a few notes here...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, I can see that I didn't give the topic the essay-like depth it might have deserved.</p><p></p><p>Really, I think that this factor has more to do with it's perception in the audience of a setting's would be fans than the actual in-milieu scope of the conflict.</p><p></p><p>Regarding Greyhawk, Odhanan may be on to something about classic status giving it a benefit that no other d20 setting is ever going to have. That said, I don't think it's the whole story. When we were gaming in Greyhawk as teens, we always made a big deal of the Scarlet Brotherhood. Further, I think that the classic module series set in Greyhawk (like Slavers, Giants, and Drow) were strongly associated with the setting and became a locus for shared experience in the setting.</p><p></p><p>Forgotten Realms, when it was growing, had the Time of Troubles, but conflicts between certain deities and nations were always highlighted and important, such as the machinions of Grazzt, the Shar/Selune conflict, as well as the threat of the Zhentarium and the Drow/Dales conflicts.</p><p></p><p>I think that having lots of little conflicts that have the potential to be used by the DM is not so much the same thing as having a larger, more crucial conflict that will likely be used as a central identifying feature of a setting among different groups, and thus build a shared experience regarding what the setting is really about.</p><p></p><p>I don't want to come across as asserting that this is the one litmus test for whether or not a setting will be successful. I will rephrase to say that I do believe a strong central conflict is a major factor in the success of a setting, and one that Spelljammer lacked that might have given in more enduring and widespread acceptance.</p><p></p><p>Market position and word of mouth will play parts as well, but among those settings that persevered against the odds and gained a significant and enduring following, I notice that the pronounced nature of a central conflict. Midnight, anyone?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Psion, post: 3523946, member: 172"] I've been pinged... let me gather a few notes here... Okay, I can see that I didn't give the topic the essay-like depth it might have deserved. Really, I think that this factor has more to do with it's perception in the audience of a setting's would be fans than the actual in-milieu scope of the conflict. Regarding Greyhawk, Odhanan may be on to something about classic status giving it a benefit that no other d20 setting is ever going to have. That said, I don't think it's the whole story. When we were gaming in Greyhawk as teens, we always made a big deal of the Scarlet Brotherhood. Further, I think that the classic module series set in Greyhawk (like Slavers, Giants, and Drow) were strongly associated with the setting and became a locus for shared experience in the setting. Forgotten Realms, when it was growing, had the Time of Troubles, but conflicts between certain deities and nations were always highlighted and important, such as the machinions of Grazzt, the Shar/Selune conflict, as well as the threat of the Zhentarium and the Drow/Dales conflicts. I think that having lots of little conflicts that have the potential to be used by the DM is not so much the same thing as having a larger, more crucial conflict that will likely be used as a central identifying feature of a setting among different groups, and thus build a shared experience regarding what the setting is really about. I don't want to come across as asserting that this is the one litmus test for whether or not a setting will be successful. I will rephrase to say that I do believe a strong central conflict is a major factor in the success of a setting, and one that Spelljammer lacked that might have given in more enduring and widespread acceptance. Market position and word of mouth will play parts as well, but among those settings that persevered against the odds and gained a significant and enduring following, I notice that the pronounced nature of a central conflict. Midnight, anyone? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Spelljammer...just wow
Top