Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thaumaturge" data-source="post: 6336260" data-attributes="member: 1927">Taste is an excuse. You don't like it. You have a different taste. That's fine.I stopped after a couple of pages. You don't have to agree with them. I'm not saying I do. I'm saying these people have a preference or an excuse for not putting spell descriptions, even short ones, in the MM.Hmmm. The MM isn't out yet, so it isn't a real problem until we see the final stat blocks, how many monsters use spells, and how unwieldy that is. I don't dispute that you think it's a problem, or that it is a problem in your experience. I don't dispute that you dislike the choice they made or that it'll negatively impact your experience. I don't dispute that it is likely the setup in the MM will be a real problem for you once it is out.All I disputed was the, in my opinion, hyperbolic stance that there is &quot;no excuse&quot; for the lack of inclusion.Thaumaturge.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thaumaturge, post: 6336260, member: 1927"] Taste is an excuse. You don't like it. You have a different taste. That's fine. I stopped after a couple of pages. You don't have to agree with them. I'm not saying I do. I'm saying these people have a preference or an excuse for not putting spell descriptions, even short ones, in the MM. Hmmm. The MM isn't out yet, so it isn't a real problem until we see the final stat blocks, how many monsters use spells, and how unwieldy that is. I don't dispute that you think it's a problem, or that it is a problem in your experience. I don't dispute that you dislike the choice they made or that it'll negatively impact your experience. I don't dispute that it is likely the setup in the MM will be a real problem for you once it is out. All I disputed was the, in my opinion, hyperbolic stance that there is "no excuse" for the lack of inclusion. Thaumaturge. [/QUOTE]

Verification