Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Elephant" data-source="post: 5189839" data-attributes="member: 17431">Who says he does?&nbsp; Customize this idea to suit -- if you don't like a longer-term reveal, don't use it.&nbsp; It's not like you're going to offend me with the way you run your game!Who says they do?Okay, Abraham.&nbsp; I'll spare the city for as few as ten righteous men <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Yeah...okay, know what?&nbsp; I was just tossing out an idea.&nbsp; I didn't ponder it for hours and cross-check it against every possible contingency.&nbsp; It was just a brainstorm.&nbsp; If you don't like it, don't use it.&nbsp; Like I said, it won't bother me.&nbsp; No need to keep beating me with &quot;but...but...you didn't take x into account, or y.&quot;So?I never suggested giving observers magic abilities.&nbsp;&nbsp; Please don't put words in my mouth.&nbsp; It's quite rude.Based on the thread, that bothered you, so I tossed in an idea for you to play with.&nbsp; Don't like it?&nbsp; Don't use it.Obviously, it *would* give you away.&nbsp; The invisible man would need to know better than to sully his invisible sword with zombie vat blood...or ford a river...or drink a cup of coffee.&nbsp; It would be using commonsense rulings of &quot;this would show&quot; or &quot;that wouldn't reasonably affect the invisibilty&quot; instead of a hard-and-fast attack/no attack rule.And you were looking for ideas to change that.&nbsp; Don't bitch me out for trying to play along.Regardless, I'm not going to argue this anymore.&nbsp; Use my idea in some capacity, or don't -- I don't really care.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Elephant, post: 5189839, member: 17431"] Who says he does? Customize this idea to suit -- if you don't like a longer-term reveal, don't use it. It's not like you're going to offend me with the way you run your game! Who says they do? Okay, Abraham. I'll spare the city for as few as ten righteous men ;) Yeah...okay, know what? I was just tossing out an idea. I didn't ponder it for hours and cross-check it against every possible contingency. It was just a brainstorm. If you don't like it, don't use it. Like I said, it won't bother me. No need to keep beating me with "but...but...you didn't take x into account, or y." So? I never suggested giving observers magic abilities. Please don't put words in my mouth. It's quite rude. Based on the thread, that bothered you, so I tossed in an idea for you to play with. Don't like it? Don't use it. Obviously, it *would* give you away. The invisible man would need to know better than to sully his invisible sword with zombie vat blood...or ford a river...or drink a cup of coffee. It would be using commonsense rulings of "this would show" or "that wouldn't reasonably affect the invisibilty" instead of a hard-and-fast attack/no attack rule. And you were looking for ideas to change that. Don't bitch me out for trying to play along. Regardless, I'm not going to argue this anymore. Use my idea in some capacity, or don't -- I don't really care. [/QUOTE]

Verification