Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spells which were not properly nerved...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 4945702" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>I would prefer we stick to the rules, since that's a vanishingly small group of spells. But if you insist, I'll pick <em>mind fog</em> and <em>symbol of insanity</em>. Technically, the symbol creates a symbol, but the spell description says to treat it as a spread. Both allow Will saves to negate for anyone in the area, or anyone who enters the area.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Obvious how? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The spell states Will negates, without qualification.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree the spell could be written more clearly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Whereas I read it as, if you center on a creature and it saves, the entire spell is kaput. If you cast it on a point in space or an unattended object, it always works, but it follows the usual rules for area spells that have Will negates.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Honestly, up to this point, no. Now that I have read the spell more carefully, I think I have been playing it incorrectly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yet is scrupulously avoids the word "target." Furthermore, <em>sanctuary</em> is a targeted spell that has Will negates, and everyone who attacks the target of a sanctuary spell gets a save, so even if the spell were targeted, it wouldn't change anything. I pointed out that it is not a targeted spell for clarity's sake, not because the interpretation I have outlined above relies on it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Those two sentences are separated by a period, so in the first place, I don't see how you can say the second line is umambiguously stating the conditions for the first. In the second place, it is possible for a Will save by the centered creature to negate the spell (entirely) and ALSO allow a negating save by everyone in the spell area. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You mean like AD&D? That can lead you astray, particularly if you try to follow the various versions of <em>darkness</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 4945702, member: 15538"] I would prefer we stick to the rules, since that's a vanishingly small group of spells. But if you insist, I'll pick [i]mind fog[/i] and [i]symbol of insanity[/i]. Technically, the symbol creates a symbol, but the spell description says to treat it as a spread. Both allow Will saves to negate for anyone in the area, or anyone who enters the area. Obvious how? The spell states Will negates, without qualification. I agree the spell could be written more clearly. Whereas I read it as, if you center on a creature and it saves, the entire spell is kaput. If you cast it on a point in space or an unattended object, it always works, but it follows the usual rules for area spells that have Will negates. Honestly, up to this point, no. Now that I have read the spell more carefully, I think I have been playing it incorrectly. Yet is scrupulously avoids the word "target." Furthermore, [i]sanctuary[/i] is a targeted spell that has Will negates, and everyone who attacks the target of a sanctuary spell gets a save, so even if the spell were targeted, it wouldn't change anything. I pointed out that it is not a targeted spell for clarity's sake, not because the interpretation I have outlined above relies on it. Those two sentences are separated by a period, so in the first place, I don't see how you can say the second line is umambiguously stating the conditions for the first. In the second place, it is possible for a Will save by the centered creature to negate the spell (entirely) and ALSO allow a negating save by everyone in the spell area. You mean like AD&D? That can lead you astray, particularly if you try to follow the various versions of [i]darkness[/i]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Spells which were not properly nerved...
Top