Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Spider-Man 3 [may contain spoilers]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 3505255" data-attributes="member: 2205"><p>Isn't this the thread for spoilers? Anyway, I'm not blacking anything out; that's too much trouble in a thread where the title specifically warns of spoilers.</p><p></p><p>So? Granted, I'm a big fan of musicals from the 40s, 50s and 60s, but given Mary Jane's desire to be an actress on Broadway, it's not at all like this was gratuitious singing. I thought it fit the storyline quite well.</p><p></p><p>I'll agree that Venom was a bit rushed, but--uh, excuse me? Why does Venom want revenge against Peter Parker? Is it somehow possible that you fell asleep during all the Eddie Brock scenes? There were a ton of them; it was one of the main story strands that was developed almost from the get-go. If you're talking about the <strong>suit</strong> wanting revenge, you're projecting. The suit was not sentient in the movie. The revenge angle was all about Brock.</p><p></p><p>I'm going to skip two of your complaints about plot contrivances which--honestly, aren't any more contrived than several in the earlier movies, and certainly less contrived than the original source material on which this movie is based.</p><p></p><p>I'm left again wondering if you had to have fallen asleep during some key moments in the film. Dr. Conner's specifically warned Peter early on that if you allowed symbiotic creatures to bond with you that it could be difficult to unbond. So when Peter--after having accepted and used the suit extensively--has trouble taking it off, that was all foreshadowed earlier. Not confusing at all.</p><p></p><p>As for why he was in the church taking if off; that's because he was up on the bell tower of the church when he decided that the suit needed to go. A nice coincidence, but not a plot whole; just a coincidence.</p><p></p><p>Whoop de doo? Am I to understand that several of your complaints are now that that the movie doesn't resemble the comic books enough? I refer you back to <em>Spiderman</em> and <em>Spiderman 2</em> to recalibrate your expectations.</p><p></p><p>- The jump the shark moment was when the green goblin, whom had tried to kill Peter twice so far in the movie, and had just had half of his face blown off by Peter, decides to help spiderman take out sandman and Venom. Forget the comic book history here, As far as this movie goes, Venom has a better chance of helping out spiderman than the green goblin</p></blockquote><p>I'm not even 100% sure what your complaint here is, but it sounds vaguely like more fanboi "d00d, they got it all wrong!" stuff again. I think you're projecting characterizations from the comic book characters onto the movie characters even though the movie characters never indicated the motivations that you were expecting. I thought Harry's switch made perfect sense, in terms of how his character had been portrayed and developed over three movies. Sure; it wasn't the comic book Harry, but so flippin' what?</p><p></p><p>No, it didn't.</p><p></p><p>This is the only one where I sorta agree with you; they tried to do a bit too much here. Sandman--being the least interesting villain of the three, having no obvious connection to the storyline going on with the other two (the redemption/forgiveness theme with Harry dovetails nicely with the black suit slash Venom storyline IMO, but felt really forced with Sandman) and having a weak retcon type introduction into the story in the first place makes him the obvious cut to me. I'd have been happier if they had decided that if they really need to show Sandman that they did it in a big opening action sequence, not unlike a James Bond movie, just to show that Spiderman does indeed fight supervillains other than just what the movies demonstrate. Give the setting a little depth, give us a nice action sequence, a little fanservice for comic book guys who want to see more supervillains on film, but don't tie him integrally to the rest of the plot and don't have him reappear.</p><p></p><p>Also, the Venom deally felt rushed. I think less Sandman means we could have seen more Venom. He's the one who felt sorta like an add-on here.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 3505255, member: 2205"] Isn't this the thread for spoilers? Anyway, I'm not blacking anything out; that's too much trouble in a thread where the title specifically warns of spoilers. So? Granted, I'm a big fan of musicals from the 40s, 50s and 60s, but given Mary Jane's desire to be an actress on Broadway, it's not at all like this was gratuitious singing. I thought it fit the storyline quite well. I'll agree that Venom was a bit rushed, but--uh, excuse me? Why does Venom want revenge against Peter Parker? Is it somehow possible that you fell asleep during all the Eddie Brock scenes? There were a ton of them; it was one of the main story strands that was developed almost from the get-go. If you're talking about the [b]suit[/b] wanting revenge, you're projecting. The suit was not sentient in the movie. The revenge angle was all about Brock. I'm going to skip two of your complaints about plot contrivances which--honestly, aren't any more contrived than several in the earlier movies, and certainly less contrived than the original source material on which this movie is based. I'm left again wondering if you had to have fallen asleep during some key moments in the film. Dr. Conner's specifically warned Peter early on that if you allowed symbiotic creatures to bond with you that it could be difficult to unbond. So when Peter--after having accepted and used the suit extensively--has trouble taking it off, that was all foreshadowed earlier. Not confusing at all. As for why he was in the church taking if off; that's because he was up on the bell tower of the church when he decided that the suit needed to go. A nice coincidence, but not a plot whole; just a coincidence. Whoop de doo? Am I to understand that several of your complaints are now that that the movie doesn't resemble the comic books enough? I refer you back to [i]Spiderman[/i] and [i]Spiderman 2[/i] to recalibrate your expectations. - The jump the shark moment was when the green goblin, whom had tried to kill Peter twice so far in the movie, and had just had half of his face blown off by Peter, decides to help spiderman take out sandman and Venom. Forget the comic book history here, As far as this movie goes, Venom has a better chance of helping out spiderman than the green goblin[/quote] I'm not even 100% sure what your complaint here is, but it sounds vaguely like more fanboi "d00d, they got it all wrong!" stuff again. I think you're projecting characterizations from the comic book characters onto the movie characters even though the movie characters never indicated the motivations that you were expecting. I thought Harry's switch made perfect sense, in terms of how his character had been portrayed and developed over three movies. Sure; it wasn't the comic book Harry, but so flippin' what? No, it didn't. This is the only one where I sorta agree with you; they tried to do a bit too much here. Sandman--being the least interesting villain of the three, having no obvious connection to the storyline going on with the other two (the redemption/forgiveness theme with Harry dovetails nicely with the black suit slash Venom storyline IMO, but felt really forced with Sandman) and having a weak retcon type introduction into the story in the first place makes him the obvious cut to me. I'd have been happier if they had decided that if they really need to show Sandman that they did it in a big opening action sequence, not unlike a James Bond movie, just to show that Spiderman does indeed fight supervillains other than just what the movies demonstrate. Give the setting a little depth, give us a nice action sequence, a little fanservice for comic book guys who want to see more supervillains on film, but don't tie him integrally to the rest of the plot and don't have him reappear. Also, the Venom deally felt rushed. I think less Sandman means we could have seen more Venom. He's the one who felt sorta like an add-on here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Spider-Man 3 [may contain spoilers]
Top