Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mr.E_Danger" data-source="post: 5862455" data-attributes="member: 6687532">I don't think there is anything wrong with a tiny &quot;railroad&quot; split, especially if it's just for one session.&nbsp; Sometimes you got to shake things up.&nbsp; So two players, each controlling 2 characters.&nbsp; Were you planning on splitting them up so that both players are with both parties? or splitting it up so the two characters being controlled by one person are going on way and the other two being controlled by the other person going the other?&nbsp; Does my question make sense?either way, i'd do a cave in.&nbsp; that way unless they can magically move 10 tons of rock and dirt, there is no way they'll get back together.&nbsp; Now how you split them up, that's the tough part.&nbsp; One thought i had was skills.&nbsp; Are there any skills in common with two, but not with the other two?&nbsp; like stealth for example?&nbsp; if two are stealthy and two are not, then have the two stealth one way once once they're far enough way, BAM, cave-in.&nbsp; Otherwise have them walk in a straight line and separate them based on &quot;random dice rolls&quot; and fudge the numbers.&nbsp; not really fair, but will get the job done.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mr.E_Danger, post: 5862455, member: 6687532"] I don't think there is anything wrong with a tiny "railroad" split, especially if it's just for one session. Sometimes you got to shake things up. So two players, each controlling 2 characters. Were you planning on splitting them up so that both players are with both parties? or splitting it up so the two characters being controlled by one person are going on way and the other two being controlled by the other person going the other? Does my question make sense? either way, i'd do a cave in. that way unless they can magically move 10 tons of rock and dirt, there is no way they'll get back together. Now how you split them up, that's the tough part. One thought i had was skills. Are there any skills in common with two, but not with the other two? like stealth for example? if two are stealthy and two are not, then have the two stealth one way once once they're far enough way, BAM, cave-in. Otherwise have them walk in a straight line and separate them based on "random dice rolls" and fudge the numbers. not really fair, but will get the job done. [/QUOTE]

Verification