Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wicked cool" data-source="post: 9374076" data-attributes="member: 85714">Not it really isn't forget the graphic etcThe plot and details that went into chunks of itSpoiler-the underdark. We really haven’t seen anything produced like this from wotc. The closest we got was duergar in rimeThe duergar have encountered the forge and there’s an evil drow plus other stuffPhandelver and the above have an ooze encounter. The ooze encounter makes much more sense in Bg3. How does a Larian writer know this but Perkins doesn’t. Hint the ooze in Bg3 is in a corner tucked away and most likely all casual gamers missed it. Phandelver it’s right there basically where every bad thing would have passed it byI could go on and on. The gith are way more developed in Bg3 . Why is Larian doing a better job with all of thisIt’s just lazy or incompetence from people that are writing this. Why is the dungeon dudes adventure better. Because she they are more creativeWe are discussing the vecna adventure and by all accounts it stinks or just not great and the main villian is underwhelming compared to mercers interpretation of itMad mage was better because it’s a straightforward dungeon crawl but it’s not greatVecna strahd soth are classics for old geezers like me. Who the classic for anything the new writers have made. Sorry ranting but not at you</blockquote>