Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[Spoilers] Spiderman: One More Day...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 3969168" data-attributes="member: 8158"><p>Yeah, I gotta think that having his wife leave him would be just as much of a distraction as his wife being around. It's not as if there aren't people in the real who get married and have kids despite leading dangerous lives.</p><p></p><p>Of course, Spidey should never have revealed his identity. That accomplished nothing positive. I didn't read Civil War, but I can't imagine what would constitute a good rationale for that action. It's not like the Registration Act requires you to make your identity public.</p><p></p><p>And think about it, guys. The dissolution of the marriage is a smokescreen for the real reason for OMD. The marriage happened before the current powers were in office, so they can say that's a bad idea and needs fixing. What they can't own up to is that it was a bad idea for Spidey to pull his mask off in a press conference, because that's a mistake they own utterly. I think we're falling for their deception. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it's the same problem that a lot of mainstream fiction has: there's a perception that UST (Unresolved Sexual Tension) is a lot more exciting than RST (Resolved Sexual Tension). For those who aren't aware, those are widely used terms used in fandom. Think of shows like Cheers, Moonlighting, and Northern Exposure, where the interest in the show plummeted once the sexual tension was resolved. Or the X-Files, where the chemistry is hinted at just enough to maintain fan interest, but never amounts to anything. Or think of a show like Friends, which employed a successful formula where relationships are consummated, then broken, then consummated, then broken, repeat and rinse until the series finale. Of course, this is all the bread-n'-butter of daytime soaps.</p><p></p><p>So that's it in a nutshell. Letting the character date again gives writers all kinds of opportunities to rehash soap-opera plots. Build up a relationship, have it fall apart despite the characters' best efforts, put that relationship on the back-burner and introduce another love interest. Just never let anything ever actually get resolution, because--as Joe would put it--we need the character to be fresh and new for the next gen of readers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felon, post: 3969168, member: 8158"] Yeah, I gotta think that having his wife leave him would be just as much of a distraction as his wife being around. It's not as if there aren't people in the real who get married and have kids despite leading dangerous lives. Of course, Spidey should never have revealed his identity. That accomplished nothing positive. I didn't read Civil War, but I can't imagine what would constitute a good rationale for that action. It's not like the Registration Act requires you to make your identity public. And think about it, guys. The dissolution of the marriage is a smokescreen for the real reason for OMD. The marriage happened before the current powers were in office, so they can say that's a bad idea and needs fixing. What they can't own up to is that it was a bad idea for Spidey to pull his mask off in a press conference, because that's a mistake they own utterly. I think we're falling for their deception. I think it's the same problem that a lot of mainstream fiction has: there's a perception that UST (Unresolved Sexual Tension) is a lot more exciting than RST (Resolved Sexual Tension). For those who aren't aware, those are widely used terms used in fandom. Think of shows like Cheers, Moonlighting, and Northern Exposure, where the interest in the show plummeted once the sexual tension was resolved. Or the X-Files, where the chemistry is hinted at just enough to maintain fan interest, but never amounts to anything. Or think of a show like Friends, which employed a successful formula where relationships are consummated, then broken, then consummated, then broken, repeat and rinse until the series finale. Of course, this is all the bread-n'-butter of daytime soaps. So that's it in a nutshell. Letting the character date again gives writers all kinds of opportunities to rehash soap-opera plots. Build up a relationship, have it fall apart despite the characters' best efforts, put that relationship on the back-burner and introduce another love interest. Just never let anything ever actually get resolution, because--as Joe would put it--we need the character to be fresh and new for the next gen of readers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[Spoilers] Spiderman: One More Day...
Top