Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mal Malenkirk" data-source="post: 131558" data-attributes="member: 834">First you roll 2D4 and multiply it by your charisma modifier.&nbsp; This can yield a negative number and of course always result in 0 if your charisma modifier is 0.Then you add you class budget bonus.Finally you add the threat code budget bonus.Yes, there is a chart based on the mission color.&nbsp; You'll see the numbers soon enough.Every member of the team gets his own mission budget based on the mechanic I described.&nbsp; These ressources can be pooled together if the agents wish, and so can the gadget points allocation.&nbsp; Only the personal budget must be spent on yourself.In my experience, players don't mind too much sharing their mission budget.&nbsp; Last session the Snoop had a mission budget of 39 whereas the soldier's was 17.&nbsp; If you consider that the snoop also had a higher personal budget, lending some budget point was much appreciated by the soldier.&nbsp; OTOH players tend to be much more possessive of their gadget points.&nbsp; Not many would share those.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mal Malenkirk, post: 131558, member: 834"] First you roll 2D4 and multiply it by your charisma modifier. This can yield a negative number and of course always result in 0 if your charisma modifier is 0. Then you add you class budget bonus. Finally you add the threat code budget bonus. Yes, there is a chart based on the mission color. You'll see the numbers soon enough. Every member of the team gets his own mission budget based on the mechanic I described. These ressources can be pooled together if the agents wish, and so can the gadget points allocation. Only the personal budget must be spent on yourself. In my experience, players don't mind too much sharing their mission budget. Last session the Snoop had a mission budget of 39 whereas the soldier's was 17. If you consider that the snoop also had a higher personal budget, lending some budget point was much appreciated by the soldier. OTOH players tend to be much more possessive of their gadget points. Not many would share those. [/QUOTE]

Verification