Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3041979" data-attributes="member: 35788">Actually, if I could tweak this a bit, I would seperate this into two halves:1.&nbsp; From an economic perspective I think that allowing arrow enhancements of all kinds (numeric or special abilities) to stack with bow enhancements of all kinds is questionable.2.&nbsp; As far as the numbers go, I don't have a problem allowing the stacking on damage rolls nearly as much as I have a problem allowing the stacking on attack rolls.&nbsp; To me allowing a +5 bow and a +5 arrow to stack to make a net total of +10 to attack is much more significant than the corresponding +10 to damage.&nbsp; I feel this way because HPs increase much more significantly than AC does.If I was playing in a game where the economic factor was null and void because magical equipment couldn't be bought and there was a housrule that said arrow/bow enhncements stack only for the purpose of damage - I'd probably be opkay with that.&nbsp; The more I think about it the more I like the non-enhancable arrow solution, however.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3041979, member: 35788"] Actually, if I could tweak this a bit, I would seperate this into two halves: 1. From an economic perspective I think that allowing arrow enhancements of all kinds (numeric or special abilities) to stack with bow enhancements of all kinds is questionable. 2. As far as the numbers go, I don't have a problem allowing the stacking on damage rolls nearly as much as I have a problem allowing the stacking on attack rolls. To me allowing a +5 bow and a +5 arrow to stack to make a net total of +10 to attack is much more significant than the corresponding +10 to damage. I feel this way because HPs increase much more significantly than AC does. If I was playing in a game where the economic factor was null and void because magical equipment couldn't be bought and there was a housrule that said arrow/bow enhncements stack only for the purpose of damage - I'd probably be opkay with that. The more I think about it the more I like the non-enhancable arrow solution, however. [/QUOTE]

Verification