Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stacking +1 ammo with +1 Weapons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3042350" data-attributes="member: 35788"><p>Closer ... yes. But still not truly balanced. Using the economic argument here, I've already shown that at the level of +7 weapons I can make a +5 bow and 300 +1 arrows (with a +1 special ability on it) compared to a +7 melee weapon. To me that just isn't right. The archer already has the advantage of not having to worry about melee attacks if he can shoot far enough away. Why should they get the ability to specialize their attacks by using cheap (in comparison to a +8 weapon) arrows? If we were to calculate how many arrows you could make between a +10 melee weapon and a +8 bow using a +1 (+1 special ability) arrow I think it would get even more disproportinate!</p><p></p><p>In any case, I could easily make the arguement that I can make 2 +5 weapons for much less than a +10 weapon. So balance is still not yet acheived even if you do let them stack up to +10.</p><p></p><p>By the way, I would like to add here that this discussion may be one of the most enjoyable discussions I've had on this board for a long time. I hope that we can continue to look at this issue and contribute possitively. Thanks to all who have participated so far.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Edit:</strong> Just for giggles....</p><p></p><p>[Igoring base costs and masterwork costs...]</p><p>+10 melee weapon (with one of the special properties as bane (___): <u>200,000 gold.</u></p><p></p><p>+8 bow: <u>128,000 gold.</u></p><p>+1 arrow with bane (_____) ability: <u>8,000 gold.</u></p><p></p><p>So, 200,000 minus the 128,000 is 72,000 gold if I am not mistaken. 72,000 divided by 8,000 should be 9, should it not? Since each bundle of arows is 50 arrows, 9 times 50 means that an archer could have <strong>450 specialized bane arrows</strong> to use with his bow for the same amount of money as a melee fighter gets 1 weapon.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this is assuming that we houseruled that bows and arrows stack completely. If we use the current 3.5 rules:</p><p></p><p>+9 bow: <u>162,000 go</u>ld.</p><p></p><p>200,000 - 162,000 = 38,000 if I did my math right. That makes 4 sets of bane arrows (<strong>200 bane arrows!</strong>) with 6,000 gold left over.</p><p></p><p>Just sayin' ... that's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3042350, member: 35788"] Closer ... yes. But still not truly balanced. Using the economic argument here, I've already shown that at the level of +7 weapons I can make a +5 bow and 300 +1 arrows (with a +1 special ability on it) compared to a +7 melee weapon. To me that just isn't right. The archer already has the advantage of not having to worry about melee attacks if he can shoot far enough away. Why should they get the ability to specialize their attacks by using cheap (in comparison to a +8 weapon) arrows? If we were to calculate how many arrows you could make between a +10 melee weapon and a +8 bow using a +1 (+1 special ability) arrow I think it would get even more disproportinate! In any case, I could easily make the arguement that I can make 2 +5 weapons for much less than a +10 weapon. So balance is still not yet acheived even if you do let them stack up to +10. By the way, I would like to add here that this discussion may be one of the most enjoyable discussions I've had on this board for a long time. I hope that we can continue to look at this issue and contribute possitively. Thanks to all who have participated so far. [B]Edit:[/B] Just for giggles.... [Igoring base costs and masterwork costs...] +10 melee weapon (with one of the special properties as bane (___): [U]200,000 gold.[/U] +8 bow: [U]128,000 gold.[/U] +1 arrow with bane (_____) ability: [U]8,000 gold.[/U] So, 200,000 minus the 128,000 is 72,000 gold if I am not mistaken. 72,000 divided by 8,000 should be 9, should it not? Since each bundle of arows is 50 arrows, 9 times 50 means that an archer could have [B]450 specialized bane arrows[/B] to use with his bow for the same amount of money as a melee fighter gets 1 weapon. Of course, this is assuming that we houseruled that bows and arrows stack completely. If we use the current 3.5 rules: +9 bow: [U]162,000 go[/U]ld. 200,000 - 162,000 = 38,000 if I did my math right. That makes 4 sets of bane arrows ([B]200 bane arrows![/B]) with 6,000 gold left over. Just sayin' ... that's all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stacking +1 ammo with +1 Weapons
Top