Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3506233" data-attributes="member: 2011">It does, but if one uses the "all images in the same square" interpretation, it does not really matter. The radius of the light does not change.I consider lighting conditions to be an effect that a figment can reproduce. For all intents and purposes, a figment is light (and/or sound).I do not consider blurring conditions (which do not exist in the game as such) an effect that a figment can reproduce.It would not be unreasonable if Mirror Image stated that it did this. It is unreasonable as an interpretation (IMO) since Mirror Image does not state that it has this level of power (and Mirror Image is already a powerful 2nd level defensive spell). Balance-wise, this is a pretty high jump in power. For example, adding Displacement to Mirror Image is huge with your interpretation. With my interpretation, the caster gets two protections, but his images do not.I do not go with FAQ bacause it is FAQ. I go with FAQ when FAQ agrees with the general rules or when FAQ clarifies a rule that is vague. This rule is not really vague. I disagree with FAQ when it pulls a brand new rule out of thin air, regardless of how reasonable that rule may be. YMMOV.</blockquote>