Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stacking question, Giant Size + Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GammaPaladin" data-source="post: 4096992" data-attributes="member: 60497"><p>Technically, no. It doesn't have a table of changes. The wording of the spell is such that it simply grants a +32 strength when you grow to colossal, regardless of what your initial size was, the bonus does not change.</p><p></p><p>If you were for instance, an elder wyrn red dragon, and already colossal, who happened to be a level 20 wu jen for some reason, you could cast Giant Size, not change size at all, and still gain the 32 strength. It's written as an explicit ability bonus, not as something <em>due</em> to the size change.</p><p></p><p>In fact, you could shrink two size categories to Huge, and still get stronger <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f635.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="O.o" title="Er... what? O.o" data-smilie="12"data-shortname="O.o" /></p><p></p><p>I <em>do</em> think it's a very poorly worded spell. I'm from the "If it isn't explicitly written, it doesn't exist" school when analyzing RAW, and the way this is written, it's a tad broken. It's probably not what they intended it to say, but it's what it does say. They should really errata it or something.</p><p></p><p>I came across it while trying to create broken builds for fun over on the Wizards CO boards (Not that I can compete with those guys), to build the strongest monk I could come up with. I'd never actually try to play it. I just like seeing what the letter of the rules will allow, and noted Giant Size as a particularly broken spell.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, it's Wu Jen only, but if you go Warforged Monk/WuJen/Enlightened Fist with Arcane Thesis and Practiced Spellcaster, Improved Natural Attack, and a Battlefist, you can still hit the Colossal +2 size table for your monk unarmed damage, and with a monk's belt, you even do it as a level 20 monk.</p><p></p><p>I can't remember the exact base damage, but it's like 27d10 or something.</p><p></p><p>That one doesn't bend a single rule either, although you could certainly rule that Battlefists and Improved Natural Attack don't stack, and force him down one size category...</p><p></p><p>But yeah, Giant Size is way too powerful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GammaPaladin, post: 4096992, member: 60497"] Technically, no. It doesn't have a table of changes. The wording of the spell is such that it simply grants a +32 strength when you grow to colossal, regardless of what your initial size was, the bonus does not change. If you were for instance, an elder wyrn red dragon, and already colossal, who happened to be a level 20 wu jen for some reason, you could cast Giant Size, not change size at all, and still gain the 32 strength. It's written as an explicit ability bonus, not as something [i]due[/i] to the size change. In fact, you could shrink two size categories to Huge, and still get stronger O.o I [i]do[/i] think it's a very poorly worded spell. I'm from the "If it isn't explicitly written, it doesn't exist" school when analyzing RAW, and the way this is written, it's a tad broken. It's probably not what they intended it to say, but it's what it does say. They should really errata it or something. I came across it while trying to create broken builds for fun over on the Wizards CO boards (Not that I can compete with those guys), to build the strongest monk I could come up with. I'd never actually try to play it. I just like seeing what the letter of the rules will allow, and noted Giant Size as a particularly broken spell. Yeah, it's Wu Jen only, but if you go Warforged Monk/WuJen/Enlightened Fist with Arcane Thesis and Practiced Spellcaster, Improved Natural Attack, and a Battlefist, you can still hit the Colossal +2 size table for your monk unarmed damage, and with a monk's belt, you even do it as a level 20 monk. I can't remember the exact base damage, but it's like 27d10 or something. That one doesn't bend a single rule either, although you could certainly rule that Battlefists and Improved Natural Attack don't stack, and force him down one size category... But yeah, Giant Size is way too powerful. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stacking question, Giant Size + Expansion
Top